Internet providers in Elk Grove, California
Fiber is available at 70.9% of the 56,200 homes and businesses the FCC counts in Elk Grove, and wired broadband of at least 100/20 Mbps at 99.1%. 70.6% of locations have a choice of two or more wired providers at that speed; at 28.5% there is only one.1
FCC National Broadband Map, availability as of June 30, 2026 (data revised November 10, 2026), as reported by providers.
Elk Grove in California
Two companies have laid fiber in Elk Grove, Consolidated Communications and Frontier, and at 32.7% of the city's homes and businesses both report it, more than five times California's share. Xfinity's cable reaches almost every location beside them, and the DSL reported at 43.2%2 of locations in 2022 had fallen to 3.8%1 by June 2026.
Who reports service in Elk Grove
The FCC counts 56,200 homes and businesses in Elk Grove as of June 30, 2026 (file revision of November 10, 2026), within the city limits drawn for the 2020 Census. Three wired networks cover most of them. Xfinity reports service at 98.9% of locations, with advertised downloads up to 2 Gbps. Consolidated Communications reports service at 57.4%, nearly all of it fiber, and Frontier at 47.7%, mostly fiber with some DSL. AT&T reports service at 36.0%, but offers 100/20 Mbps at only 3.4%1.
| unWired Broadband | Fixed wireless | 100.0% | 97.3% | 500 Mbps | – |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xfinity | Fiber Cable | 98.9% | 98.9% | 2 Gbps | 28.2% |
| DigitalPath Inc | Licensed wireless | 98.7% | 98.7% | 200 Mbps | – |
| T-Mobile | Licensed wireless | 80.8% | 33.1% | 100 Mbps | – |
| Consolidated Communications | Fiber DSL | 57.4% | 57.2% | 2 Gbps | 0.0% |
| Frontier | Fiber DSL | 47.7% | 46.4% | 7 Gbps | 0.3% |
| Verizon | Licensed wireless | 46.8% | 21.3% | 1 Gbps | – |
| AT&T | Fiber DSL Licensed wireless | 36.0% | 3.4% | 5 Gbps | – |
| Softcom Internet Communications Inc | Licensed wireless | 6.4% | 6.4% | 500 Mbps | – |
| Succeed.Net | Fixed wireless | 2.3% | 2.3% | 100 Mbps | – |
| Zeta Broadband | Fixed wireless | 0.2% | 0.2% | 400 Mbps | – |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of the area's broadband serviceable locations where the provider reports service as of June 30, 2026. "Only wired option" is the share of locations where it is the single wired provider at 100/20 Mbps. Provider-reported and challengeable; speeds are advertised maximums, not measured; no prices. Satellite providers (HughesNet, Viasat, Starlink) report service at nearly every location and are left out of the table.
The rest of the list is radio and satellite: two fixed wireless companies other than the national carriers that each reach almost the whole city, the national carriers' home internet, a few smaller radio networks, and three satellite services reported at every location. A provider counts as available where it told the FCC it can install service within ten business days; anyone can challenge that claim on the FCC National Broadband Map.
Two fiber footprints that overlap
Fiber from at least one provider reaches 70.9% of Elk Grove's locations, well above California (47.8%) and above the national share (62.6%). Among the 343 cities of 100,000 or more, that is a middling figure (162nd lowest). The unusual part is how it is split. Consolidated reports fiber at 57.2% of locations and Frontier at 46.4%, and the two footprints overlap: 32.7% of locations have two or more fiber providers, the 56th highest share among those cities. Statewide the figure is 5.8%, nationally 12.1%1.
That overlap is new. In June 2022, 7.4% of locations had two fiber providers, while fiber of any kind already reached 65.5%2. Since then the share with any fiber rose by 5.4 percentage points and the share with two rose by 25.3 percentage points1: most of the fiber added since 2022 reached locations that already had a fiber provider.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Two or more fiber networks |
|---|---|
| Elk Grove | 32.7% |
| Sacramento | 17.7% |
| United States | 12.1% |
| California | 5.8% |
| Roseville | 0.5% |
| Fresno | 0.2% |
| Stockton | 0.0% |
Sacramento, the neighbor to the north, has two fiber providers at 17.7% of locations, Fresno at 0.2%, Roseville at 0.5% and Stockton at 0.0%1.
Copper almost gone, uploads up
In June 2022 DSL over telephone copper was reported at 43.2%2 of Elk Grove's locations. By June 2026 the share was 3.8%, a fall of 39.4 percentage points, while California still reports DSL at 43.7%1. What DSL remains is reported mostly by Frontier and AT&T; Consolidated, the larger fiber network, reports almost none.
Advertised speeds moved over the same years. Symmetrical wired service of 100/100 Mbps went from 65.5% of locations to 90.0%, and the FCC's gigabit tier (1 Gbps down with at least 100 Mbps up) from 62.7% to 90.0%, against 67.4% statewide. Both now exceed the fiber share, so part of that reach is advertised over cable. The fastest advertised download is 2 Gbps or more at 90.0% of locations, up from 18.1%2; Frontier advertises up to 7 Gbps1. These are providers' advertised maximums, not measured speeds.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of December 31, 2025; FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Shares of broadband serviceable locations in each FCC release (latest revision of each); the small number is the change in percentage points since June 30, 2022. The FCC's count of locations is updated with each release, so shares are compared rather than counts.
Show the numbers
| Measure | June 30, 2022 | December 31, 2025 | June 30, 2026 | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSL available | 43.2% | 4.1% | 3.8% | −39.4 pts |
| Two or more fiber networks | 7.4% | 32.1% | 32.7% | 25.3 pts |
| Wired 100/100 Mbps | 65.5% | 84.9% | 90.0% | 24.5 pts |
| Gigabit (1,000/100) | 62.7% | 85.1% | 90.0% | 27.3 pts |
One wire, two or three
Wired service of at least 100/20 Mbps is reported at 99.1% of locations. The number of wired providers offering it splits the city into three groups of similar size: one provider at 28.5%, two at 37.5% and three or more at 33.1%. In June 2022 only 7.1%2 had three or more. At least two are reported at 70.6% of locations, against 49.9%1 across California.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Different wired providers (fiber, cable or DSL; FCC provider IDs) reporting 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up or more at the same location. Fixed wireless and satellite are not counted.
Show the numbers
| Area | None | One | Two | Three or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elk Grove | 0.9% | 28.5% | 37.5% | 33.1% |
| California | 6.9% | 43.2% | 43.4% | 6.5% |
| United States | 7.8% | 36.6% | 44.6% | 11.1% |
Where there is only one fast wire, it is almost always cable: Xfinity is the only wired provider at 100/20 Mbps for 28.2% of locations, Frontier for 0.3%1. Those are largely the parts of the city outside both fiber footprints.
Fixed wireless at nearly every address
Licensed fixed wireless, the category that includes 5G home internet, reaches 100/20 Mbps at 99.6% of locations, the 4th highest share among large cities, up from 20.2%2 in June 2022. Counting wired and fixed wireless providers together, 99.2% of locations have three or more offering 100/20 Mbps, the 2nd highest1 share among large cities.
The widest coverage does not come from the national carriers. DigitalPath Inc reports licensed fixed wireless at 98.7% of locations, advertising up to 200 Mbps, and unWired Broadband reports unlicensed fixed wireless at 100.0%, with 100/20 Mbps at 97.3%. T-Mobile's footprint is larger than Verizon's (80.8% against 46.8%), but each offers 100/20 Mbps at a minority of locations. A third licensed fixed wireless company, Softcom, reports service at 6.4%1.
New Bedford, Massachusetts 12.2%San Angelo, Texas 100.0%
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Each dot is a city. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Fixed wireless 100/20 |
|---|---|
| San Angelo, Texas | 100.0% |
| Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 99.9% |
| Berkeley, California | 99.8% |
| Elk Grove, California | 99.6% |
| Edinburg, Texas | 98.6% |
| San Francisco, California | 98.6% |
| Concord, California | 98.5% |
| South Bend, Indiana | 98.2% |
| Edmond, Oklahoma | 97.7% |
| Boulder, Colorado | 96.8% |
| Killeen, Texas | 96.7% |
| Abilene, Texas | 96.3% |
| Sunnyvale, California | 96.1% |
| Waco, Texas | 95.9% |
| Daly City, California | 95.6% |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | 95.5% |
| Oakland, California | 95.0% |
| St. George, Utah | 94.7% |
| Santa Clara, California | 94.6% |
| San Jose, California | 94.0% |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | 92.9% |
| Tracy, California | 92.7% |
| Lincoln, Nebraska | 92.7% |
| Eugene, Oregon | 92.6% |
| Odessa, Texas | 92.6% |
| Fresno, California | 92.3% |
| Jackson, Mississippi | 92.1% |
| Richmond, California | 91.6% |
| McAllen, Texas | 91.1% |
| Pueblo, Colorado | 90.7% |
| Clovis, California | 89.5% |
| Fremont, California | 87.0% |
| Wichita Falls, Texas | 86.3% |
| Chico, California | 86.3% |
| Colorado Springs, Colorado | 84.4% |
| Corpus Christi, Texas | 83.2% |
| Denver, Colorado | 83.1% |
| San Mateo, California | 81.4% |
| Vacaville, California | 81.1% |
| Fort Myers, Florida | 80.9% |
| Hayward, California | 80.4% |
| Anchorage, Alaska | 79.2% |
| Fort Worth, Texas | 79.0% |
| Lee's Summit, Missouri | 78.5% |
| Springfield, Illinois | 78.2% |
| Modesto, California | 77.7% |
| Amarillo, Texas | 77.6% |
| Cleveland, Ohio | 77.3% |
| Brownsville, Texas | 76.9% |
| Antioch, California | 75.7% |
| Pembroke Pines, Florida | 75.2% |
| Glendale, Arizona | 75.2% |
| Georgetown, Texas | 73.9% |
| Stockton, California | 73.7% |
| Frisco, Texas | 73.2% |
| Mesa, Arizona | 72.0% |
| Dearborn, Michigan | 72.0% |
| New Braunfels, Texas | 71.6% |
| Cambridge, Massachusetts | 71.3% |
| Broken Arrow, Oklahoma | 71.3% |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | 71.0% |
| San Antonio, Texas | 70.3% |
| Bend, Oregon | 70.0% |
| St. Louis, Missouri | 69.1% |
| Scottsdale, Arizona | 68.3% |
| Fort Collins, Colorado | 68.3% |
| Austin, Texas | 68.1% |
| Joliet, Illinois | 67.8% |
| Norman, Oklahoma | 67.5% |
| Boise, Idaho | 67.1% |
| Arlington, Texas | 66.5% |
| Inglewood, California | 66.1% |
| Tyler, Texas | 66.0% |
| Omaha, Nebraska | 66.0% |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota | 65.8% |
| Salem, Oregon | 65.4% |
| Las Cruces, New Mexico | 65.3% |
| Little Rock, Arkansas | 65.2% |
| Overland Park, Kansas | 65.1% |
| Phoenix, Arizona | 64.8% |
| Tempe, Arizona | 64.7% |
| Aurora, Illinois | 64.7% |
| Fayetteville, North Carolina | 64.7% |
| Seattle, Washington | 64.6% |
| Kansas City, Missouri | 64.4% |
| Lexington, Kentucky | 64.3% |
| Ann Arbor, Michigan | 64.2% |
| Bakersfield, California | 64.0% |
| Montgomery, Alabama | 63.8% |
| Huntsville, Alabama | 63.7% |
| Irvine, California | 63.7% |
| Shreveport, Louisiana | 63.4% |
| Topeka, Kansas | 63.3% |
| Springfield, Missouri | 63.2% |
| Grand Prairie, Texas | 63.2% |
| Columbia, South Carolina | 63.2% |
| Fort Wayne, Indiana | 63.1% |
| Surprise, Arizona | 62.9% |
| Chandler, Arizona | 62.6% |
| McKinney, Texas | 62.6% |
| Salt Lake City, Utah | 62.6% |
| Carmel, Indiana | 62.3% |
| Mesquite, Texas | 62.3% |
| Beaumont, Texas | 62.2% |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 61.7% |
| Salinas, California | 61.6% |
| Dayton, Ohio | 61.3% |
| Cincinnati, Ohio | 61.0% |
| Cary, North Carolina | 61.0% |
| Roseville, California | 60.9% |
| Burbank, California | 60.8% |
| Chicago, Illinois | 60.4% |
| Boca Raton, Florida | 60.4% |
| Charlotte, North Carolina | 60.3% |
| Spokane, Washington | 60.3% |
| Orlando, Florida | 60.0% |
| Fayetteville, Arkansas | 59.9% |
| Chattanooga, Tennessee | 59.8% |
| Torrance, California | 59.8% |
| Tacoma, Washington | 59.7% |
| Sugar Land, Texas | 59.7% |
| Green Bay, Wisconsin | 59.6% |
| Wichita, Kansas | 59.6% |
| Tallahassee, Florida | 59.4% |
| Fishers, Indiana | 59.4% |
| Fullerton, California | 59.3% |
| Portland, Oregon | 59.0% |
| Naperville, Illinois | 58.8% |
| Round Rock, Texas | 58.8% |
| Miramar, Florida | 58.8% |
| Provo, Utah | 58.6% |
| Everett, Washington | 58.5% |
| Richardson, Texas | 58.5% |
| Gilbert, Arizona | 58.5% |
| Hillsboro, Oregon | 58.4% |
| Centennial, Colorado | 58.3% |
| Sacramento, California | 58.3% |
| Nashville, Tennessee | 58.3% |
| New Orleans, Louisiana | 58.1% |
| Madison, Wisconsin | 58.0% |
| Knoxville, Tennessee | 57.9% |
| Pearland, Texas | 57.7% |
| Peoria, Illinois | 57.6% |
| Columbia, Missouri | 57.4% |
| Bellevue, Washington | 57.3% |
| Los Angeles, California | 57.2% |
| Memphis, Tennessee | 57.1% |
| Albany, New York | 57.0% |
| Rochester, New York | 57.0% |
| West Jordan, Utah | 56.8% |
| Westminster, Colorado | 56.7% |
| Lubbock, Texas | 56.6% |
| Houston, Texas | 56.5% |
| Lafayette, Louisiana | 56.5% |
| Orange, California | 56.4% |
| Indianapolis, Indiana | 56.4% |
| Louisville, Kentucky | 56.3% |
| Concord, North Carolina | 56.2% |
| Atlanta, Georgia | 56.2% |
| Savannah, Georgia | 55.8% |
| Chula Vista, California | 55.7% |
| New York, New York | 55.7% |
| Miami Gardens, Florida | 55.3% |
| Independence, Missouri | 55.2% |
| Kansas City, Kansas | 55.2% |
| El Paso, Texas | 55.0% |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | 54.9% |
| Akron, Ohio | 54.7% |
| Olathe, Kansas | 54.5% |
| Birmingham, Alabama | 54.5% |
| Anaheim, California | 54.2% |
| Evansville, Indiana | 54.2% |
| North Charleston, South Carolina | 53.8% |
| Costa Mesa, California | 53.8% |
| Laredo, Texas | 53.8% |
| Tucson, Arizona | 53.7% |
| Midland, Texas | 53.7% |
| Allen, Texas | 53.7% |
| Ventura, California | 53.6% |
| Arvada, Colorado | 53.5% |
| Sandy Springs, Georgia | 53.4% |
| Mobile, Alabama | 53.4% |
| Columbus, Ohio | 53.3% |
| Baton Rouge, Louisiana | 53.3% |
| Baltimore, Maryland | 52.9% |
| Lakewood, Colorado | 52.9% |
| Warren, Michigan | 52.7% |
| Hollywood, Florida | 52.5% |
| Miami, Florida | 52.4% |
| Spokane Valley, Washington | 52.3% |
| Vallejo, California | 52.3% |
| Visalia, California | 52.0% |
| Denton, Texas | 51.6% |
| Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 51.4% |
| Santa Ana, California | 51.3% |
| El Monte, California | 51.2% |
| Augusta, Georgia | 51.1% |
| Pasadena, California | 50.7% |
| Alexandria, Virginia | 50.7% |
| Rochester, Minnesota | 50.6% |
| Hialeah, Florida | 50.4% |
| Meridian, Idaho | 50.3% |
| Yuma, Arizona | 50.3% |
| Wilmington, North Carolina | 50.0% |
| Corona, California | 50.0% |
| Manchester, New Hampshire | 49.8% |
| Washington, District of Columbia | 49.8% |
| Des Moines, Iowa | 49.4% |
| Long Beach, California | 49.3% |
| Pasadena, Texas | 49.3% |
| Renton, Washington | 49.2% |
| Oceanside, California | 49.1% |
| Conroe, Texas | 48.9% |
| San Diego, California | 48.8% |
| Charleston, South Carolina | 48.4% |
| Riverside, California | 48.4% |
| St. Paul, Minnesota | 47.9% |
| Glendale, California | 47.8% |
| Detroit, Michigan | 47.7% |
| Boston, Massachusetts | 47.6% |
| Sparks, Nevada | 47.4% |
| Grand Rapids, Michigan | 47.3% |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 47.2% |
| Reno, Nevada | 47.1% |
| Pompano Beach, Florida | 46.8% |
| College Station, Texas | 46.6% |
| Durham, North Carolina | 46.3% |
| Sterling Heights, Michigan | 46.1% |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | 46.0% |
| Gresham, Oregon | 46.0% |
| Dallas, Texas | 45.8% |
| Carlsbad, California | 45.7% |
| Aurora, Colorado | 45.4% |
| Greensboro, North Carolina | 45.2% |
| St. Petersburg, Florida | 45.2% |
| Huntington Beach, California | 45.1% |
| Billings, Montana | 45.1% |
| Fort Lauderdale, Florida | 44.8% |
| Murfreesboro, Tennessee | 44.8% |
| Rancho Cucamonga, California | 44.5% |
| Garden Grove, California | 44.4% |
| Greeley, Colorado | 44.3% |
| Clarksville, Tennessee | 43.6% |
| Tuscaloosa, Alabama | 43.5% |
| Kent, Washington | 43.4% |
| El Cajon, California | 43.4% |
| Las Vegas, Nevada | 43.4% |
| Richmond, Virginia | 42.9% |
| Goodyear, Arizona | 42.5% |
| Buffalo, New York | 42.4% |
| Quincy, Massachusetts | 42.2% |
| Rockford, Illinois | 42.2% |
| Jersey City, New Jersey | 42.1% |
| Jacksonville, Florida | 41.9% |
| Peoria, Arizona | 41.8% |
| Davenport, Iowa | 41.6% |
| Toledo, Ohio | 41.2% |
| Avondale, Arizona | 41.0% |
| Lakeland, Florida | 41.0% |
| High Point, North Carolina | 41.0% |
| Vancouver, Washington | 40.8% |
| Fargo, North Dakota | 40.4% |
| Plano, Texas | 40.4% |
| Carrollton, Texas | 39.8% |
| Athens, Georgia | 39.7% |
| Tampa, Florida | 39.5% |
| Springfield, Massachusetts | 39.5% |
| Elgin, Illinois | 38.9% |
| League City, Texas | 38.9% |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | 38.9% |
| Lansing, Michigan | 38.8% |
| Longmont, Colorado | 38.8% |
| Davie, Florida | 38.3% |
| Downey, California | 38.2% |
| Henderson, Nevada | 38.1% |
| Columbus, Georgia | 38.1% |
| Chesapeake, Virginia | 37.3% |
| Syracuse, New York | 37.2% |
| Jurupa Valley, California | 36.7% |
| Irving, Texas | 35.9% |
| Palm Bay, Florida | 35.7% |
| Thornton, Colorado | 35.7% |
| Coral Springs, Florida | 35.3% |
| West Palm Beach, Florida | 35.3% |
| Gainesville, Florida | 34.9% |
| Fairfield, California | 34.3% |
| Cedar Rapids, Iowa | 34.3% |
| Simi Valley, California | 34.2% |
| New Haven, Connecticut | 34.1% |
| Norfolk, Virginia | 34.0% |
| Hartford, Connecticut | 33.8% |
| Macon, Georgia | 33.5% |
| Buckeye, Arizona | 33.3% |
| Yonkers, New York | 33.1% |
| Clearwater, Florida | 33.1% |
| South Fulton, Georgia | 33.0% |
| Rialto, California | 32.8% |
| Nampa, Idaho | 32.7% |
| Palm Coast, Florida | 32.4% |
| Fontana, California | 32.0% |
| Suffolk, Virginia | 31.7% |
| Garland, Texas | 31.7% |
| Hesperia, California | 31.6% |
| West Valley City, Utah | 31.0% |
| Lewisville, Texas | 30.8% |
| Santa Rosa, California | 30.8% |
| Paterson, New Jersey | 30.5% |
| Cape Coral, Florida | 30.0% |
| Thousand Oaks, California | 29.9% |
| Murrieta, California | 29.8% |
| Port St. Lucie, Florida | 29.4% |
| Lancaster, California | 28.9% |
| Palmdale, California | 28.9% |
| Virginia Beach, Virginia | 28.4% |
| Pomona, California | 28.4% |
| San Bernardino, California | 28.0% |
| Ontario, California | 27.9% |
| Newark, New Jersey | 27.8% |
| Allentown, Pennsylvania | 27.6% |
| Hampton, Virginia | 27.3% |
| Escondido, California | 26.6% |
| West Covina, California | 26.4% |
| Stamford, Connecticut | 26.2% |
| Deltona, Florida | 25.9% |
| Temecula, California | 25.6% |
| Lynn, Massachusetts | 25.6% |
| Newport News, Virginia | 24.7% |
| Worcester, Massachusetts | 24.7% |
| Oxnard, California | 24.0% |
| Providence, Rhode Island | 23.5% |
| Moreno Valley, California | 23.0% |
| North Las Vegas, Nevada | 22.7% |
| Menifee, California | 22.6% |
| Santa Maria, California | 22.4% |
| Santa Clarita, California | 21.9% |
| Elizabeth, New Jersey | 20.5% |
| Honolulu, Hawaii | 19.5% |
| Victorville, California | 19.4% |
| Brockton, Massachusetts | 18.6% |
| Bridgeport, Connecticut | 18.4% |
| Waterbury, Connecticut | 18.0% |
| Lowell, Massachusetts | 17.0% |
| New Bedford, Massachusetts | 12.2% |
Radio capacity is shared by everyone on a tower, so these figures show where providers report service, not where every home could sign up at once. For 4831 locations, fixed wireless is the only way to get 100/20 Mbps: no wired provider reports that speed there. No location in the city is left with satellite alone.
What Elk Grove households subscribe to
The Census Bureau's 2025 survey counts households, not locations. In Elk Grove, 96.4% of households had a broadband subscription of some kind (margin of error ±1.7 percentage points) and 84.1% subscribed to cable, fiber or DSL (±3.2 percentage points). 9.1% relied on a cellular data plan alone (±2.3 percentage points), and 3.6% had no internet subscription (±1.6 percentage points4). The survey does not say which network a household uses.
Elk Grove beside its Central Valley neighbors
The table sets Elk Grove against Sacramento, Roseville, Stockton and Fresno on the same FCC release. Elk Grove has the most fiber of the five, but the wider gaps are in overlap, in the number of fast wires per address and in how much copper remains.
| Area | Fiber available | Two or more fiber networks | Three or more wired choices | DSL available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elk Grove, California | 70.9% | 32.7% | 33.1% | 3.8% |
| Sacramento, California | 60.1% | 17.7% | 19.1% | 45.1% |
| Roseville, California | 61.1% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 31.9% |
| Stockton, California | 37.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 67.5% |
| Fresno, California | 39.6% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 52.8% |
| California | 47.8% | 5.8% | 6.5% | 43.7% |
| United States | 62.6% | 12.1% | 11.1% | 36.2% |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
The Sacramento page covers the capital, and the California page maps every county, including Sacramento County, where Elk Grove sits.
Questions and answers
What internet providers are available in Elk Grove, California?
As of June 30, 2026, Xfinity reports service at 98.9% of locations (cable), Consolidated Communications at 57.4% (almost all fiber) and Frontier at 47.7% (mostly fiber). Fixed wireless comes from unWired Broadband (100.0%), DigitalPath Inc (98.7%), T-Mobile (80.8%), Verizon (46.8%1) and AT&T. Satellite is reported everywhere.
Is fiber internet available in Elk Grove?
At 70.9% of locations, against 47.8% across California and 62.6% nationally. Consolidated reports fiber at 57.2% of locations and Frontier at 46.4%; where their footprints overlap, at 32.7%1, a home has two fiber providers.
How many internet providers are there in Elk Grove?
12 providers report wired or fixed wireless service somewhere in the city, 4 of them over wires and 4 over fiber. At one address the count of wired providers offering 100/20 Mbps is smaller: one at 28.5% of locations, two at 37.5% and three or more at 33.1%1.
Is 5G home internet available in Elk Grove?
T-Mobile reports home internet at 80.8% of locations and Verizon at 46.8%, with 100/20 Mbps at 33.1% and 21.3%1. The carriers decide eligibility address by address, according to the capacity of each cell.
Checking one address in Elk Grove
The figures on this page describe the whole area. Which providers report service at a single home or apartment is shown only on the FCC's own map: search the address at broadbandmap.fcc.gov. If a provider is listed there but cannot actually connect you within ten business days, or the location is missing or misplaced, the map has a button to file a challenge; providers must respond, and corrections flow into later releases. Prices and plans are not part of the FCC data: each provider must show them on its broadband facts label at the point of sale.
More on internet in California
The state picture, county by county: internet in California. Other large cities in the state: Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, San Francisco, Fresno, Sacramento, Long Beach, Oakland, Bakersfield, Anaheim, Stockton and Riverside. Compare Elk Grove with any other city or state in the comparison tool.
Sources
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Availability as of June 30, 2026; released November 10, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; Availability as of June 30, 2022; released May 10, 2024. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of December 31, 2025; Availability as of December 31, 2025; released November 3, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables; 2025 (calendar-year sample); released October 29, 2026. api.census.gov
Margins of error (±) are at the 90% confidence level. A difference is called significant only when it passes the Census Bureau's test at that level. How every figure is built: methodology. Found an error? Write to [email protected]; corrections are listed on the updates page.