Internet in Kansas City, Kansas
Fiber is available at 94.2% of the 53,333 homes and businesses the FCC counts in Kansas City, and wired broadband of at least 100/20 Mbps at 98.8%. 91.7% of locations have a choice of two or more wired providers at that speed; at 7.1% there is only one.1
FCC National Broadband Map, availability as of June 30, 2026 (data revised November 10, 2026), as reported by providers.
Kansas City in Kansas
In Kansas City, Kansas, a fiber network reaches about as many addresses as the cable company: Google Fiber reports service at 87.9% of its homes and businesses and Spectrum at 88.6%. In the six months to June 2026 a second fiber network spread across much of the city, and the share of locations with two fiber providers went from 16.4%2 to 43.0%1.
Google Fiber beside Spectrum
Two providers report almost the same reach in Kansas City, Kansas. Google Fiber reports fiber service at 87.9% of the city's 53,333 homes and businesses on the FCC National Broadband Map as of June 30, 2026 (revision November 10, 2026), and Spectrum's cable network reports 88.6%1. The city was named in Google's March 2011 announcement, "Ultra high-speed broadband is coming to Kansas City, Kansas".
| Spectrum | Fiber Cable | 88.6% | 88.6% | 1 Gbps | 4.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Fiber | Fiber | 87.9% | 87.9% | 8 Gbps | 0.1% |
| AT&T | Fiber DSL Licensed wireless | 87.8% | 20.1% | 5 Gbps | 0.1% |
| T-Mobile | Licensed wireless | 83.9% | 32.3% | 100 Mbps | – |
| Verizon | Licensed wireless | 76.0% | 23.4% | 1 Gbps | – |
| Everfast Fiber | Fiber Cable | 45.6% | 45.6% | 2 Gbps | 2.3% |
| Wisper ISP, LLC | Licensed wireless Fixed wireless | 15.9% | 15.8% | 400 Mbps | – |
| Midco | Fiber Cable | 8.9% | 8.9% | 5 Gbps | 0.6% |
| Nexus Air Fiber | Fixed wireless | 1.9% | 1.9% | 600 Mbps | – |
| Mercury Fiber | Licensed wireless | 1.0% | 1.0% | 150 Mbps | – |
| KC Web | Fixed wireless | 0.1% | 0.1% | 200 Mbps | – |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of the area's broadband serviceable locations where the provider reports service as of June 30, 2026. "Only wired option" is the share of locations where it is the single wired provider at 100/20 Mbps. Provider-reported and challengeable; speeds are advertised maximums, not measured; no prices. Satellite providers (HughesNet, Starlink, Viasat) report service at nearly every location and are left out of the table.
Among the other wired providers, AT&T reports service at 87.8% of locations, mostly over DSL; it reports fiber at 8.8%. Everfast Fiber reports 45.6%. Midco reports 8.9%1, mostly cable. In these filings, a provider that lists a location is saying it could connect standard service there within ten business days. Anyone can dispute a listing on the FCC map, and that map is the place to look up a single address. The shares cover the city limits as drawn for the 2020 Census.
A second fiber network, mostly in the last six months
Fiber of any kind was already common here in June 2022, at 84.3% of locations. It now reaches 94.2%, the 29th highest share among the 343 US cities of 100,000 or more, against 81.3% across Kansas and 62.6% nationally. The larger change is overlap. The share of locations where two or more different companies report fiber was 4.0%3 in June 2022 and 16.4%2 in December 2025; by June 2026 it was 43.0%, a rise of 26.6 percentage points1 in six months.
The newest of these networks is Everfast Fiber. The June 2022 data have no Everfast entry for the city; the company now reports fiber at 45.6% of locations, or 24,339 homes and businesses, with advertised downloads up to 2 Gbps. Over those four years, 43 fiber companies with a presence somewhere in the city became 51.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of December 31, 2025; FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Shares of broadband serviceable locations in each FCC release (latest revision of each); the small number is the change in percentage points since June 30, 2022. The FCC's count of locations is updated with each release, so shares are compared rather than counts.
Show the numbers
| Measure | June 30, 2022 | December 31, 2025 | June 30, 2026 | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two or more fiber networks | 4.0% | 16.4% | 43.0% | 39.0 pts |
| Three or more wired choices | 12.0% | 21.3% | 46.0% | 34.0 pts |
| Two wired choices | 72.3% | 67.7% | 45.7% | −26.6 pts |
| One wired choice | 11.3% | 7.7% | 7.1% | −4.2 pts |
Three wired choices now at about half of addresses
Nearly every location (98.8%) has at least one wired 100/20 Mbps offer; Everfast's arrival changed how many. The second fiber network shifted the number of choices at that speed. Locations with three or more wired providers went from 21.3% in December 2025 to 46.0%, while those with exactly two fell from 67.7%2 to 45.7%. Across Kansas, 64.0% of locations have two or more wired choices at 100/20; in Kansas City, Kansas, 91.7%1 do.
New Bedford, Massachusetts 0.0%Simi Valley, California 99.0%
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Each dot is a city. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Two or more wired choices |
|---|---|
| Simi Valley, California | 99.0% |
| Knoxville, Tennessee | 98.9% |
| Longmont, Colorado | 98.6% |
| Chattanooga, Tennessee | 98.4% |
| Clarksville, Tennessee | 98.3% |
| Lincoln, Nebraska | 98.3% |
| Olathe, Kansas | 97.9% |
| Allentown, Pennsylvania | 97.6% |
| Greeley, Colorado | 97.1% |
| Sugar Land, Texas | 96.9% |
| Overland Park, Kansas | 96.8% |
| Concord, California | 96.6% |
| Warren, Michigan | 96.5% |
| Amarillo, Texas | 96.5% |
| Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 96.2% |
| Dearborn, Michigan | 96.2% |
| Independence, Missouri | 95.9% |
| San Mateo, California | 95.7% |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | 95.6% |
| Naperville, Illinois | 95.5% |
| Miami Gardens, Florida | 95.5% |
| Huntsville, Alabama | 95.3% |
| Sterling Heights, Michigan | 95.1% |
| Lynn, Massachusetts | 94.9% |
| Lee's Summit, Missouri | 94.9% |
| Kansas City, Missouri | 94.7% |
| Cary, North Carolina | 94.6% |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | 94.5% |
| Conroe, Texas | 94.5% |
| Washington, District of Columbia | 94.3% |
| Wichita Falls, Texas | 94.1% |
| Fargo, North Dakota | 93.8% |
| Pearland, Texas | 93.8% |
| Palm Coast, Florida | 93.5% |
| Davenport, Iowa | 93.5% |
| Elgin, Illinois | 93.5% |
| Columbus, Ohio | 93.3% |
| West Valley City, Utah | 93.2% |
| Des Moines, Iowa | 93.2% |
| Allen, Texas | 93.1% |
| Fishers, Indiana | 92.9% |
| St. Petersburg, Florida | 92.8% |
| Springfield, Missouri | 92.6% |
| Round Rock, Texas | 92.3% |
| Montgomery, Alabama | 92.2% |
| Columbia, Missouri | 92.1% |
| Berkeley, California | 92.0% |
| Menifee, California | 92.0% |
| Temecula, California | 92.0% |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota | 92.0% |
| Odessa, Texas | 91.9% |
| Waco, Texas | 91.8% |
| Kansas City, Kansas | 91.7% |
| St. Paul, Minnesota | 91.7% |
| Clearwater, Florida | 91.7% |
| Oakland, California | 91.6% |
| Lexington, Kentucky | 91.5% |
| Boston, Massachusetts | 91.5% |
| Frisco, Texas | 91.3% |
| Cape Coral, Florida | 91.2% |
| Tacoma, Washington | 91.2% |
| Mesquite, Texas | 91.0% |
| Murrieta, California | 90.8% |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | 90.8% |
| Jersey City, New Jersey | 90.7% |
| Abilene, Texas | 90.6% |
| Hillsboro, Oregon | 90.5% |
| Killeen, Texas | 90.4% |
| West Jordan, Utah | 90.4% |
| Corpus Christi, Texas | 90.3% |
| Richmond, Virginia | 90.2% |
| Carmel, Indiana | 90.2% |
| Brockton, Massachusetts | 90.1% |
| High Point, North Carolina | 90.1% |
| Newport News, Virginia | 89.8% |
| Salt Lake City, Utah | 89.8% |
| Daly City, California | 89.8% |
| Garland, Texas | 89.7% |
| Lafayette, Louisiana | 89.7% |
| Bridgeport, Connecticut | 89.7% |
| League City, Texas | 89.2% |
| Columbus, Georgia | 89.2% |
| Plano, Texas | 89.1% |
| Centennial, Colorado | 89.1% |
| Carrollton, Texas | 88.9% |
| Lubbock, Texas | 88.7% |
| South Fulton, Georgia | 88.6% |
| Lansing, Michigan | 88.3% |
| Fort Wayne, Indiana | 88.1% |
| Arlington, Texas | 88.1% |
| Richardson, Texas | 88.1% |
| Coral Springs, Florida | 88.0% |
| San Angelo, Texas | 87.8% |
| Cincinnati, Ohio | 87.7% |
| McKinney, Texas | 87.7% |
| Rochester, Minnesota | 87.6% |
| Wichita, Kansas | 87.3% |
| San Antonio, Texas | 87.1% |
| Louisville, Kentucky | 87.1% |
| Durham, North Carolina | 87.1% |
| New Haven, Connecticut | 87.1% |
| Concord, North Carolina | 87.0% |
| Midland, Texas | 87.0% |
| Murfreesboro, Tennessee | 86.9% |
| Miramar, Florida | 86.8% |
| Tampa, Florida | 86.8% |
| Nashville, Tennessee | 86.7% |
| Providence, Rhode Island | 86.5% |
| Pembroke Pines, Florida | 86.4% |
| Provo, Utah | 86.4% |
| Hesperia, California | 86.4% |
| Grand Prairie, Texas | 86.1% |
| Manchester, New Hampshire | 86.1% |
| New York, New York | 86.0% |
| Omaha, Nebraska | 86.0% |
| Honolulu, Hawaii | 85.7% |
| Yuma, Arizona | 85.6% |
| Pasadena, Texas | 85.5% |
| Fayetteville, North Carolina | 85.4% |
| Downey, California | 85.0% |
| Norfolk, Virginia | 85.0% |
| Pueblo, Colorado | 84.9% |
| Grand Rapids, Michigan | 84.8% |
| Fort Collins, Colorado | 84.5% |
| Tyler, Texas | 84.4% |
| Waterbury, Connecticut | 84.3% |
| Chesapeake, Virginia | 84.1% |
| North Charleston, South Carolina | 83.7% |
| Virginia Beach, Virginia | 83.4% |
| Long Beach, California | 83.2% |
| Houston, Texas | 83.1% |
| Dallas, Texas | 83.0% |
| Fayetteville, Arkansas | 82.9% |
| Seattle, Washington | 82.8% |
| Thousand Oaks, California | 82.8% |
| Charlotte, North Carolina | 82.7% |
| Everett, Washington | 82.5% |
| Topeka, Kansas | 82.5% |
| Alexandria, Virginia | 82.5% |
| Irving, Texas | 82.4% |
| Fort Worth, Texas | 82.2% |
| Austin, Texas | 81.9% |
| Port St. Lucie, Florida | 81.8% |
| Victorville, California | 81.6% |
| Broken Arrow, Oklahoma | 81.2% |
| Surprise, Arizona | 80.7% |
| Lancaster, California | 80.7% |
| Mobile, Alabama | 80.6% |
| Gresham, Oregon | 80.5% |
| Greensboro, North Carolina | 80.5% |
| Pomona, California | 80.5% |
| Lowell, Massachusetts | 80.2% |
| Portland, Oregon | 80.1% |
| West Covina, California | 79.9% |
| Richmond, California | 79.7% |
| Hialeah, Florida | 79.3% |
| Atlanta, Georgia | 78.9% |
| Stamford, Connecticut | 78.9% |
| Denver, Colorado | 78.9% |
| Miami, Florida | 78.5% |
| Spokane, Washington | 78.4% |
| Ontario, California | 78.2% |
| Tallahassee, Florida | 78.0% |
| Sandy Springs, Georgia | 77.9% |
| Hollywood, Florida | 77.8% |
| Westminster, Colorado | 77.7% |
| Fullerton, California | 77.6% |
| Peoria, Illinois | 77.6% |
| Cedar Rapids, Iowa | 77.5% |
| Indianapolis, Indiana | 77.4% |
| Norman, Oklahoma | 77.2% |
| Chicago, Illinois | 76.8% |
| Colorado Springs, Colorado | 76.7% |
| Deltona, Florida | 76.4% |
| Charleston, South Carolina | 76.1% |
| Tuscaloosa, Alabama | 76.1% |
| Green Bay, Wisconsin | 76.0% |
| Little Rock, Arkansas | 75.9% |
| Newark, New Jersey | 75.4% |
| Baton Rouge, Louisiana | 75.2% |
| Hartford, Connecticut | 74.8% |
| Nampa, Idaho | 74.7% |
| Meridian, Idaho | 74.2% |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | 74.1% |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 74.0% |
| Jacksonville, Florida | 73.8% |
| Lewisville, Texas | 73.6% |
| Lakewood, Colorado | 73.5% |
| Madison, Wisconsin | 72.9% |
| South Bend, Indiana | 72.8% |
| Denton, Texas | 72.2% |
| New Braunfels, Texas | 72.0% |
| Elizabeth, New Jersey | 71.8% |
| San Francisco, California | 71.1% |
| Fort Lauderdale, Florida | 70.9% |
| Yonkers, New York | 70.7% |
| Elk Grove, California | 70.6% |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | 70.5% |
| Columbia, South Carolina | 70.2% |
| Chula Vista, California | 69.9% |
| Buckeye, Arizona | 69.8% |
| Torrance, California | 69.4% |
| Garden Grove, California | 69.4% |
| Moreno Valley, California | 69.4% |
| West Palm Beach, Florida | 69.4% |
| St. Louis, Missouri | 69.1% |
| Huntington Beach, California | 69.0% |
| San Bernardino, California | 68.6% |
| Augusta, Georgia | 68.4% |
| Edmond, Oklahoma | 67.9% |
| Hampton, Virginia | 67.8% |
| Syracuse, New York | 67.7% |
| Hayward, California | 67.4% |
| Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 67.4% |
| Brownsville, Texas | 67.1% |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 67.1% |
| Wilmington, North Carolina | 67.0% |
| Santa Maria, California | 66.9% |
| Suffolk, Virginia | 66.8% |
| Palm Bay, Florida | 66.3% |
| Boca Raton, Florida | 66.2% |
| Pompano Beach, Florida | 65.8% |
| Sacramento, California | 65.3% |
| Sparks, Nevada | 65.1% |
| Davie, Florida | 65.0% |
| Paterson, New Jersey | 64.7% |
| Springfield, Illinois | 64.6% |
| Memphis, Tennessee | 64.5% |
| Goodyear, Arizona | 63.7% |
| Beaumont, Texas | 63.4% |
| Orlando, Florida | 63.2% |
| Shreveport, Louisiana | 62.7% |
| Laredo, Texas | 62.6% |
| Evansville, Indiana | 62.6% |
| Arvada, Colorado | 62.2% |
| Roseville, California | 62.1% |
| Lakeland, Florida | 61.9% |
| Savannah, Georgia | 61.8% |
| Dayton, Ohio | 61.7% |
| El Paso, Texas | 61.2% |
| Thornton, Colorado | 61.1% |
| Gainesville, Florida | 60.9% |
| Burbank, California | 60.4% |
| Oxnard, California | 59.9% |
| Aurora, Colorado | 59.5% |
| Ann Arbor, Michigan | 58.8% |
| Rockford, Illinois | 58.6% |
| Buffalo, New York | 58.4% |
| St. George, Utah | 57.9% |
| Cleveland, Ohio | 57.8% |
| Akron, Ohio | 57.3% |
| Santa Clara, California | 56.6% |
| Edinburg, Texas | 55.8% |
| Santa Ana, California | 55.7% |
| Reno, Nevada | 55.7% |
| Mesa, Arizona | 55.7% |
| Inglewood, California | 55.4% |
| Sunnyvale, California | 55.2% |
| Athens, Georgia | 55.2% |
| Birmingham, Alabama | 54.6% |
| New Orleans, Louisiana | 54.6% |
| Los Angeles, California | 54.3% |
| College Station, Texas | 54.1% |
| Jackson, Mississippi | 53.4% |
| Eugene, Oregon | 52.4% |
| Costa Mesa, California | 52.2% |
| Rochester, New York | 52.0% |
| Vallejo, California | 51.9% |
| Irvine, California | 51.9% |
| Boulder, Colorado | 51.7% |
| San Diego, California | 51.7% |
| Vancouver, Washington | 51.3% |
| San Jose, California | 51.3% |
| Pasadena, California | 49.1% |
| Glendale, California | 47.8% |
| Aurora, Illinois | 47.0% |
| El Cajon, California | 46.8% |
| Fremont, California | 45.8% |
| Glendale, Arizona | 45.7% |
| Macon, Georgia | 45.7% |
| Toledo, Ohio | 45.6% |
| Fort Myers, Florida | 44.4% |
| Fresno, California | 44.3% |
| Antioch, California | 44.1% |
| Carlsbad, California | 44.0% |
| Peoria, Arizona | 43.7% |
| Riverside, California | 43.4% |
| Stockton, California | 43.3% |
| Palmdale, California | 42.9% |
| Billings, Montana | 42.6% |
| Santa Rosa, California | 42.3% |
| McAllen, Texas | 42.0% |
| Boise, Idaho | 41.3% |
| Anaheim, California | 41.1% |
| Springfield, Massachusetts | 40.9% |
| Bakersfield, California | 40.7% |
| Las Cruces, New Mexico | 39.7% |
| Clovis, California | 39.4% |
| Modesto, California | 38.8% |
| Salinas, California | 38.6% |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | 38.3% |
| Orange, California | 37.1% |
| Georgetown, Texas | 37.1% |
| Gilbert, Arizona | 36.9% |
| Joliet, Illinois | 36.6% |
| Las Vegas, Nevada | 36.5% |
| Chandler, Arizona | 36.3% |
| Bellevue, Washington | 35.7% |
| Detroit, Michigan | 35.3% |
| Fontana, California | 35.2% |
| El Monte, California | 34.5% |
| Salem, Oregon | 34.4% |
| Worcester, Massachusetts | 34.3% |
| Visalia, California | 34.1% |
| Tucson, Arizona | 34.1% |
| Jurupa Valley, California | 31.7% |
| Fairfield, California | 31.7% |
| Santa Clarita, California | 30.9% |
| Tracy, California | 30.8% |
| Chico, California | 30.3% |
| Vacaville, California | 29.6% |
| Scottsdale, Arizona | 28.7% |
| Oceanside, California | 28.5% |
| Bend, Oregon | 28.0% |
| Spokane Valley, Washington | 27.7% |
| Henderson, Nevada | 27.3% |
| North Las Vegas, Nevada | 25.7% |
| Rialto, California | 25.2% |
| Avondale, Arizona | 24.5% |
| Ventura, California | 24.1% |
| Escondido, California | 23.0% |
| Phoenix, Arizona | 22.5% |
| Kent, Washington | 20.8% |
| Rancho Cucamonga, California | 20.1% |
| Corona, California | 18.0% |
| Baltimore, Maryland | 16.6% |
| Renton, Washington | 16.6% |
| Quincy, Massachusetts | 9.8% |
| Anchorage, Alaska | 8.3% |
| Tempe, Arizona | 7.5% |
| Cambridge, Massachusetts | 6.3% |
| Albany, New York | 0.4% |
| New Bedford, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
A single wired option remains at 7.1% of locations, down from 11.3%3 in June 2022. Where it remains it is most often Spectrum, the only wired 100/20 provider at 4.1% of locations. The FCC data show 652 locations with no wired provider at 100/20 Mbps and 21 without wired or licensed fixed wireless service of 25/3 Mbps, the federal BEAD program's test for an unserved location. The count that depends on satellite alone is 01.
Copper and fixed wireless alongside the fiber
Copper phone lines remain a large part of AT&T's filing. DSL is listed at 72.5% of locations, which ranks tied for 62nd highest among large cities; in June 2022 it was 76.9%3. Counting fiber, DSL and fixed wireless together, AT&T lists 100/20 Mbps at only 20.1%1 of locations.
Fixed wireless from the mobile carriers has also spread. Verizon added more locations in the city than any other provider between June 2022 and June 2026, and now reports home internet at 40,509 locations, or 76.0% of the city; T-Mobile reports 83.9%. Wisper ISP, a regional fixed wireless provider, reports 15.9%. Licensed fixed wireless at 100/20 Mbps or faster is listed at 55.2%1 of locations, below the 73.9%3 of June 2022.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of broadband serviceable locations where at least one provider reports the technology, at any speed; a location can have several. Satellite is reported almost everywhere and is left out.
Show the numbers
| Technology | Kansas City | Kansas |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber | 94.2% | 81.3% |
| Cable | 95.2% | 69.0% |
| DSL (copper) | 72.5% | 39.4% |
| Licensed fixed wireless (incl. 5G home) | 96.8% | 91.4% |
| Unlicensed fixed wireless | 2.1% | 23.7% |
The fastest advertised download is 2 Gbps or more at 94.1% of locations, and symmetrical wired service of 100/100 Mbps is reported at 94.2%1. Both figures are the providers' advertised maximums; nobody measured them.
Networks on the street, smartphones at home
The Census Bureau's American Community Survey counts households over a year, not locations on one date, so it measures something different: what people buy. In the 2025 survey, 92.2% of households in Kansas City, Kansas had a broadband subscription of any type (margin of error ±2.4 percentage points), close to the Kansas figure of 93.4%. Subscriptions to cable, fiber or DSL were 77.4% (±4.2 percentage points4).
What stands out is the device at home. 18.0% of households had a smartphone and no desktop, laptop or tablet (margin of error ±3.0 percentage points), the 21st highest point estimate among large cities and well above the statewide 10.5%. Another 4.5%4 had no computer of any kind.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables. Availability is a share of locations as of June 30, 2026 (FCC); subscriptions are a share of households from the American Community Survey, 2025 (whiskers: 90% margin of error). Different units and dates: read the gap as a sign, not an exact number.
Show the numbers
| Measure | Share | MOE |
|---|---|---|
| Wired 100/20 Mbps available (FCC, share of locations) | 98.8% | |
| Households subscribing to cable, fiber or DSL (Census) | 77.4% | ±4.2 |
| Households relying only on a cellular data plan | 9.8% | ±2.7 |
| Households with no internet subscription | 6.6% | ±2.1 |
Subscriptions have risen since before the pandemic. In 2019, 17.4% of households had no internet subscription (margin of error ±2.7 percentage points); in 2025 the figure was 6.6% (±2.1 percentage points). Wired subscriptions went from 65.8%5 to 77.4%4 over the same years.
| Area | Households whose only computer is a smartphone | Households without an internet subscription | Households subscribing to cable, fiber or DSL | Two or more fiber networks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas City, Kansas | 18.0% ±3.0 | 6.6% ±2.1 | 77.4% ±4.2 | 43.0% |
| Kansas City, Missouri | 11.4% ±1.7 | 5.9% ±1.3 | 79.8% ±1.5 | 68.9% |
| Overland Park, Kansas | 3.1% ±1.1 | 3.1% ±1.1 | 85.9% ±2.0 | 91.0% |
| Olathe, Kansas | 4.2% ±1.7 | 2.6% ±1.5 | 88.3% ±1.5 | 82.1% |
| Kansas | 10.5% ±0.4 | 6.4% ±0.4 | 74.9% ±0.7 | 33.9% |
| United States | – | – | – | 12.1% |
Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables; FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Period: 2025. ± is the 90% margin of error.
Kansas City, Kansas is a separate city from Kansas City, Missouri, across the state line. The largest Kansas city in the same metro area is Overland Park. For Wyandotte County, where the city lies, and the rest of the state county by county, see the Kansas page.
Kansas City, Kansas internet questions
What internet providers are available in Kansas City, Kansas?
The wired providers with the widest reported service are Google Fiber (87.9% of locations, fiber), Spectrum (88.6%, almost all cable), AT&T (87.8%, mostly DSL with fiber at 8.8%) and Everfast Fiber (45.6%1). T-Mobile and Verizon report fixed wireless home internet, and satellite is reported everywhere.
Is Google Fiber available in Kansas City, Kansas?
Google Fiber reports fiber at 87.9% of the city's 53,333 homes and businesses as of June 30, 2026, with advertised downloads up to 8 Gbps1. It is the provider with the largest reported footprint in the city.
How many internet providers are there in Kansas City, Kansas?
7 wired providers report service somewhere in the city, up from 53 in June 2022, and 13 once fixed wireless is included. At a single location, 46.0% have three or more wired providers offering 100/20 Mbps, and 7.1%1 have only one.
Is 5G home internet available in Kansas City, Kansas?
T-Mobile reports fixed wireless home internet at 83.9% of locations and Verizon at 76.0%, yet each offers 100/20 Mbps at a far smaller share: T-Mobile at 32.3%, Verizon at 23.4%1. A reported location is not a confirmed sign-up; each carrier checks the address.
Checking one address in Kansas City
The figures on this page describe the whole area. Which providers report service at a single home or apartment is shown only on the FCC's own map: search the address at broadbandmap.fcc.gov. If a provider is listed there but cannot actually connect you within ten business days, or the location is missing or misplaced, the map has a button to file a challenge; providers must respond, and corrections flow into later releases. Prices and plans are not part of the FCC data: each provider must show them on its broadband facts label at the point of sale.
More on internet in Kansas
The state picture, county by county: internet in Kansas. Other large cities in the state: Wichita, Overland Park, Olathe and Topeka. Compare Kansas City with any other city or state in the comparison tool.
Sources
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Availability as of June 30, 2026; released November 10, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of December 31, 2025; Availability as of December 31, 2025; released November 3, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; Availability as of June 30, 2022; released May 10, 2024. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables; 2025 (calendar-year sample); released October 29, 2026. api.census.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019 1-year detailed tables; 2019. api.census.gov
Margins of error (±) are at the 90% confidence level. A difference is called significant only when it passes the Census Bureau's test at that level. How every figure is built: methodology. Found an error? Write to [email protected]; corrections are listed on the updates page.