Internet in Warren, Michigan
Fiber is available at 49.8% of the 49,496 homes and businesses the FCC counts in Warren, and wired broadband of at least 100/20 Mbps at 99.7%. 96.5% of locations have a choice of two or more wired providers at that speed; at 3.2% there is only one.1
FCC National Broadband Map, availability as of June 30, 2026 (data revised November 10, 2026), as reported by providers.
Warren in Michigan
Warren is a two-cable city. Xfinity reports service at 99.4% of its homes and businesses and WOW! at 95.3%, so 96.5% have at least two wired providers offering 100/20 Mbps, tied for 13th highest among the country's 343 largest cities. Fiber is the thinner layer: it reaches 49.8%, almost all of it from AT&T, and a second fiber network is reported at only 0.0%1.
Xfinity and WOW! on the same streets
Two cable companies each report service at nearly every location in Warren. As of June 30, 2026, Xfinity reports cable or fiber service at 99.4% of the city's 49,496 homes and businesses, advertising downloads of up to 2 Gbps, and WOW! reports cable at 95.3%, up to 1.2 Gbps. Cable of any brand reaches 99.5% of locations, tied for 42nd highest share among large cities. Michigan is WOW!'s largest state: it reports 47,190 locations in Warren out of 712,5581 statewide.
| Xfinity | Cable | 99.4% | 99.4% | 2 Gbps | 2.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOW! | Cable | 95.3% | 95.3% | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1% |
| AT&T | Fiber DSL Licensed wireless | 93.5% | 62.9% | 5 Gbps | 0.2% |
| Verizon | Licensed wireless | 85.2% | 34.0% | 1 Gbps | – |
| T-Mobile | Licensed wireless | 83.9% | 29.0% | 100 Mbps | – |
| 123.NET Inc | Fiber | 1.3% | 1.3% | 6 Gbps | – |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of the area's broadband serviceable locations where the provider reports service as of June 30, 2026. "Only wired option" is the share of locations where it is the single wired provider at 100/20 Mbps. Provider-reported and challengeable; speeds are advertised maximums, not measured; no prices. Satellite providers (HughesNet, Viasat, Starlink) report service at nearly every location and are left out of the table.
AT&T is the third wire, reported at 93.5% of locations but at 100/20 Mbps or faster at only 62.9%1. The satellite companies report the whole city, as they do everywhere; no Warren location depends on satellite alone.
Each provider files its own list of locations with the FCC, and a location counts as served when the company says it can connect it within ten business days of an order. Residents can dispute a listing on the FCC map. The area is Warren as bounded in the 2020 Census.
Choice at 100/20 Mbps
Because the two cable networks overlap, nearly every Warren location has more than one fast wired option. Wired service of 100/20 Mbps or more is reported at 99.7% of locations, and 96.5% have two or more such providers, against 44.4% across Michigan and 55.6% nationally. Where AT&T's fiber is added, the count reaches three: 54.5% of locations have three or more wired choices, the 35th highest1 share among large cities.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Different wired providers (fiber, cable or DSL; FCC provider IDs) reporting 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up or more at the same location. Fixed wireless and satellite are not counted.
Show the numbers
| Area | None | One | Two | Three or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warren | 0.3% | 3.2% | 42.0% | 54.5% |
| Michigan | 8.7% | 46.9% | 30.6% | 13.8% |
| United States | 7.8% | 36.6% | 44.6% | 11.1% |
The exceptions are a few hundred addresses. 1,568 locations have a single wired provider at 100/20, and 143 have none; fixed wireless reaches that speed at 31 of those, leaving 1121 without any terrestrial service at 100/20.
Fiber stops at about half the city
Fiber from any provider reaches 49.8% of Warren's locations, the 85th lowest share among the 343 largest cities and above the Michigan figure of 42.6%. It was 33.9%2 in June 2022, a rise of 15.9 percentage points; the last six months added 1.9 percentage points1.
New Bedford, Massachusetts 0.0%Clarksville, Tennessee 100.0%
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Each dot is a city. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Fiber available |
|---|---|
| Chattanooga, Tennessee | 100.0% |
| Clarksville, Tennessee | 100.0% |
| Lincoln, Nebraska | 99.9% |
| Simi Valley, California | 99.9% |
| Longmont, Colorado | 99.9% |
| Overland Park, Kansas | 99.3% |
| Knoxville, Tennessee | 99.0% |
| Olathe, Kansas | 98.1% |
| Amarillo, Texas | 98.0% |
| Greeley, Colorado | 97.6% |
| Kansas City, Missouri | 97.4% |
| Abilene, Texas | 97.2% |
| Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 97.0% |
| Bridgeport, Connecticut | 96.8% |
| Sugar Land, Texas | 96.6% |
| Yonkers, New York | 96.3% |
| Independence, Missouri | 96.2% |
| Wichita Falls, Texas | 95.8% |
| Lee's Summit, Missouri | 95.8% |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | 95.7% |
| Elizabeth, New Jersey | 95.4% |
| Miami Gardens, Florida | 95.4% |
| Cary, North Carolina | 95.1% |
| Lynn, Massachusetts | 95.0% |
| Palm Coast, Florida | 94.8% |
| Paterson, New Jersey | 94.7% |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | 94.7% |
| Davenport, Iowa | 94.3% |
| Kansas City, Kansas | 94.2% |
| Conroe, Texas | 94.1% |
| Cape Coral, Florida | 94.0% |
| San Angelo, Texas | 94.0% |
| Pearland, Texas | 93.9% |
| Menifee, California | 93.8% |
| Newark, New Jersey | 93.7% |
| Des Moines, Iowa | 93.6% |
| Frisco, Texas | 93.5% |
| Stamford, Connecticut | 93.5% |
| Round Rock, Texas | 93.3% |
| Springfield, Missouri | 93.0% |
| Newport News, Virginia | 92.9% |
| West Valley City, Utah | 92.9% |
| Huntsville, Alabama | 92.8% |
| Columbia, Missouri | 92.6% |
| Temecula, California | 92.6% |
| Fishers, Indiana | 92.5% |
| Murrieta, California | 92.3% |
| Killeen, Texas | 92.3% |
| Lubbock, Texas | 92.2% |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota | 92.0% |
| Berkeley, California | 91.6% |
| Lexington, Kentucky | 91.6% |
| St. Paul, Minnesota | 91.6% |
| Garland, Texas | 91.6% |
| Lafayette, Louisiana | 91.6% |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | 91.5% |
| Mesquite, Texas | 91.5% |
| High Point, North Carolina | 91.2% |
| Providence, Rhode Island | 91.1% |
| Jersey City, New Jersey | 91.1% |
| Richmond, Virginia | 91.0% |
| Allen, Texas | 91.0% |
| Hillsboro, Oregon | 91.0% |
| Yuma, Arizona | 90.9% |
| Plano, Texas | 90.7% |
| New York, New York | 90.3% |
| Carrollton, Texas | 90.3% |
| Wichita, Kansas | 90.3% |
| Brockton, Massachusetts | 90.1% |
| Oakland, California | 90.1% |
| Cincinnati, Ohio | 90.1% |
| Rochester, Minnesota | 90.1% |
| Honolulu, Hawaii | 90.0% |
| Salt Lake City, Utah | 89.8% |
| Tyler, Texas | 89.8% |
| Norman, Oklahoma | 89.7% |
| Norfolk, Virginia | 89.6% |
| Durham, North Carolina | 89.5% |
| South Fulton, Georgia | 89.5% |
| McKinney, Texas | 89.4% |
| League City, Texas | 89.4% |
| Carmel, Indiana | 89.3% |
| Richardson, Texas | 89.2% |
| West Jordan, Utah | 88.8% |
| Fort Wayne, Indiana | 88.8% |
| Concord, North Carolina | 88.7% |
| Allentown, Pennsylvania | 88.7% |
| Louisville, Kentucky | 88.6% |
| San Mateo, California | 88.3% |
| Buckeye, Arizona | 88.3% |
| Omaha, Nebraska | 88.2% |
| Chesapeake, Virginia | 88.2% |
| San Antonio, Texas | 88.2% |
| Tampa, Florida | 87.9% |
| Broken Arrow, Oklahoma | 87.9% |
| Fayetteville, North Carolina | 87.8% |
| Provo, Utah | 87.6% |
| Lansing, Michigan | 87.6% |
| Arlington, Texas | 87.4% |
| Washington, District of Columbia | 87.4% |
| Surprise, Arizona | 87.4% |
| Grand Prairie, Texas | 87.4% |
| Boston, Massachusetts | 87.3% |
| New Haven, Connecticut | 87.2% |
| Pembroke Pines, Florida | 87.2% |
| Murfreesboro, Tennessee | 87.1% |
| Hesperia, California | 87.1% |
| Miramar, Florida | 86.8% |
| Centennial, Colorado | 86.8% |
| Nashville, Tennessee | 86.6% |
| Downey, California | 86.2% |
| Manchester, New Hampshire | 86.1% |
| Fort Worth, Texas | 86.0% |
| Pueblo, Colorado | 85.0% |
| Virginia Beach, Virginia | 84.8% |
| Fayetteville, Arkansas | 84.8% |
| Pasadena, Texas | 84.6% |
| Dallas, Texas | 84.4% |
| Waterbury, Connecticut | 84.3% |
| Hialeah, Florida | 83.9% |
| Topeka, Kansas | 83.8% |
| Charlotte, North Carolina | 83.6% |
| Long Beach, California | 83.6% |
| Fort Collins, Colorado | 83.5% |
| Everett, Washington | 83.0% |
| Thousand Oaks, California | 83.0% |
| Irving, Texas | 82.8% |
| Midland, Texas | 82.8% |
| Lancaster, California | 82.5% |
| Alexandria, Virginia | 82.4% |
| Austin, Texas | 82.4% |
| Port St. Lucie, Florida | 82.1% |
| Victorville, California | 82.0% |
| Houston, Texas | 81.9% |
| Ontario, California | 81.9% |
| Greensboro, North Carolina | 81.8% |
| Grand Rapids, Michigan | 81.6% |
| Pomona, California | 81.4% |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | 81.1% |
| Coral Springs, Florida | 80.9% |
| West Covina, California | 80.7% |
| Gresham, Oregon | 80.7% |
| Lowell, Massachusetts | 80.3% |
| Odessa, Texas | 80.0% |
| Seattle, Washington | 79.9% |
| Portland, Oregon | 79.5% |
| Mobile, Alabama | 79.3% |
| Goodyear, Arizona | 79.2% |
| Baton Rouge, Louisiana | 78.2% |
| Richmond, California | 78.2% |
| Atlanta, Georgia | 78.1% |
| Corpus Christi, Texas | 78.1% |
| Tallahassee, Florida | 78.0% |
| Peoria, Illinois | 77.8% |
| Denton, Texas | 77.5% |
| Hollywood, Florida | 77.0% |
| Denver, Colorado | 76.9% |
| Daly City, California | 76.9% |
| Spokane, Washington | 76.9% |
| Miami, Florida | 76.8% |
| Fullerton, California | 76.8% |
| Deltona, Florida | 76.4% |
| Lewisville, Texas | 75.9% |
| Tuscaloosa, Alabama | 75.8% |
| Little Rock, Arkansas | 75.2% |
| Meridian, Idaho | 75.1% |
| Hartford, Connecticut | 74.9% |
| Suffolk, Virginia | 74.9% |
| Indianapolis, Indiana | 74.8% |
| Westminster, Colorado | 74.8% |
| Green Bay, Wisconsin | 74.4% |
| Colorado Springs, Colorado | 74.0% |
| Nampa, Idaho | 74.0% |
| Sandy Springs, Georgia | 73.7% |
| Jacksonville, Florida | 73.3% |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | 73.3% |
| Chula Vista, California | 72.5% |
| Lakewood, Colorado | 72.1% |
| Madison, Wisconsin | 71.6% |
| Edmond, Oklahoma | 71.5% |
| New Braunfels, Texas | 71.3% |
| Elk Grove, California | 70.9% |
| Hampton, Virginia | 70.8% |
| Columbia, South Carolina | 70.4% |
| Moreno Valley, California | 70.0% |
| Huntington Beach, California | 69.9% |
| St. Petersburg, Florida | 69.9% |
| Syracuse, New York | 69.7% |
| Orlando, Florida | 69.7% |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 69.5% |
| Waco, Texas | 69.2% |
| Brownsville, Texas | 69.2% |
| South Bend, Indiana | 69.1% |
| San Bernardino, California | 69.0% |
| Wilmington, North Carolina | 68.9% |
| Fort Lauderdale, Florida | 68.5% |
| West Palm Beach, Florida | 67.6% |
| Torrance, California | 67.3% |
| Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 67.2% |
| Santa Maria, California | 67.0% |
| Garden Grove, California | 66.2% |
| Beaumont, Texas | 65.6% |
| Laredo, Texas | 65.2% |
| Hayward, California | 65.1% |
| St. Louis, Missouri | 65.1% |
| St. George, Utah | 64.5% |
| Evansville, Indiana | 63.6% |
| Gainesville, Florida | 62.9% |
| Lakeland, Florida | 62.9% |
| Davie, Florida | 62.7% |
| Springfield, Illinois | 62.6% |
| Sparks, Nevada | 62.6% |
| Palm Bay, Florida | 62.6% |
| Shreveport, Louisiana | 62.5% |
| Savannah, Georgia | 62.2% |
| Memphis, Tennessee | 62.1% |
| Dayton, Ohio | 61.8% |
| Boca Raton, Florida | 61.5% |
| Pompano Beach, Florida | 61.4% |
| Columbus, Georgia | 61.3% |
| Roseville, California | 61.1% |
| Oxnard, California | 61.0% |
| San Francisco, California | 60.8% |
| Peoria, Arizona | 60.8% |
| Montgomery, Alabama | 60.7% |
| Sacramento, California | 60.1% |
| El Paso, Texas | 60.0% |
| Buffalo, New York | 59.9% |
| Rockford, Illinois | 58.7% |
| Edinburg, Texas | 58.6% |
| Mesa, Arizona | 58.6% |
| College Station, Texas | 58.3% |
| Athens, Georgia | 57.1% |
| Clearwater, Florida | 57.0% |
| New Orleans, Louisiana | 56.9% |
| Cleveland, Ohio | 56.1% |
| Charleston, South Carolina | 55.4% |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 55.1% |
| Akron, Ohio | 55.1% |
| Fort Myers, Florida | 55.0% |
| Thornton, Colorado | 55.0% |
| Reno, Nevada | 54.0% |
| Birmingham, Alabama | 53.5% |
| Rochester, New York | 53.3% |
| Scottsdale, Arizona | 53.2% |
| Santa Ana, California | 53.1% |
| Tacoma, Washington | 53.1% |
| Toledo, Ohio | 52.8% |
| Ann Arbor, Michigan | 52.7% |
| Inglewood, California | 52.4% |
| Irvine, California | 52.3% |
| Aurora, Colorado | 52.2% |
| Los Angeles, California | 51.9% |
| Burbank, California | 51.8% |
| Santa Clara, California | 51.7% |
| Glendale, Arizona | 50.9% |
| Jackson, Mississippi | 50.3% |
| Arvada, Colorado | 50.2% |
| Warren, Michigan | 49.8% |
| Sunnyvale, California | 49.7% |
| Macon, Georgia | 49.3% |
| Eugene, Oregon | 49.0% |
| Costa Mesa, California | 47.7% |
| Boulder, Colorado | 45.2% |
| Henderson, Nevada | 44.9% |
| Pasadena, California | 44.8% |
| Las Vegas, Nevada | 44.8% |
| San Diego, California | 44.6% |
| Billings, Montana | 44.3% |
| North Las Vegas, Nevada | 44.1% |
| San Jose, California | 43.9% |
| McAllen, Texas | 43.7% |
| El Cajon, California | 43.6% |
| North Charleston, South Carolina | 43.2% |
| Vancouver, Washington | 42.9% |
| Vallejo, California | 42.9% |
| Chandler, Arizona | 41.1% |
| Springfield, Massachusetts | 41.1% |
| Aurora, Illinois | 41.1% |
| Dearborn, Michigan | 40.8% |
| Columbus, Ohio | 40.4% |
| Fresno, California | 39.6% |
| Glendale, California | 39.5% |
| Georgetown, Texas | 38.5% |
| Gilbert, Arizona | 38.4% |
| Riverside, California | 38.3% |
| Fremont, California | 38.2% |
| Antioch, California | 37.7% |
| Stockton, California | 37.2% |
| Concord, California | 37.0% |
| Avondale, Arizona | 37.0% |
| Palmdale, California | 36.9% |
| Chicago, Illinois | 36.6% |
| Boise, Idaho | 36.1% |
| Anaheim, California | 36.0% |
| Carlsbad, California | 36.0% |
| Las Cruces, New Mexico | 36.0% |
| Bakersfield, California | 35.5% |
| Santa Rosa, California | 35.5% |
| Worcester, Massachusetts | 35.3% |
| Cedar Rapids, Iowa | 35.2% |
| Bend, Oregon | 35.2% |
| Clovis, California | 34.9% |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | 34.0% |
| Tucson, Arizona | 34.0% |
| Augusta, Georgia | 34.0% |
| El Monte, California | 33.8% |
| Phoenix, Arizona | 31.4% |
| Salinas, California | 31.2% |
| Chico, California | 30.7% |
| Fontana, California | 30.5% |
| Modesto, California | 29.7% |
| Orange, California | 28.7% |
| Joliet, Illinois | 27.8% |
| Jurupa Valley, California | 27.8% |
| Detroit, Michigan | 27.4% |
| Bellevue, Washington | 27.4% |
| Visalia, California | 27.3% |
| Elgin, Illinois | 27.3% |
| Salem, Oregon | 26.9% |
| Oceanside, California | 26.7% |
| Tracy, California | 24.2% |
| Ventura, California | 23.8% |
| Fargo, North Dakota | 22.6% |
| Tempe, Arizona | 22.3% |
| Sterling Heights, Michigan | 22.0% |
| Fairfield, California | 21.8% |
| Rancho Cucamonga, California | 21.7% |
| Rialto, California | 20.7% |
| Spokane Valley, Washington | 20.6% |
| Vacaville, California | 18.6% |
| Santa Clarita, California | 18.3% |
| Naperville, Illinois | 18.0% |
| Baltimore, Maryland | 16.7% |
| Kent, Washington | 15.9% |
| Escondido, California | 15.6% |
| Corona, California | 13.0% |
| Renton, Washington | 10.5% |
| Quincy, Massachusetts | 9.0% |
| Anchorage, Alaska | 6.2% |
| Albany, New York | 2.0% |
| Cambridge, Massachusetts | 0.5% |
| New Bedford, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
Almost all of it is AT&T's: the company reports fiber at 48.4% of locations, advertising up to 5 Gbps. Elsewhere in the city AT&T's service is DSL over telephone copper or its own fixed wireless, with advertised downloads of up to 100 Mbps. 123NET reports fiber at 1.3% of locations. Only 2 companies report fiber anywhere in Warren, the same number as in June 2022; by that count the city is tied for 3rd lowest among large cities. With so little overlap, a choice between two fiber networks exists at 0.0%1 of locations.
Uploads rose on the cable networks
Wired service at 100/20 Mbps already reached the whole city in 2022; what has changed since is upload speed. In June 2022, wired plans advertising at least 100 Mbps up and 100 Mbps down reached 33.9% of Warren's locations, roughly the fiber footprint of the time. By June 2026 the figure was 94.4%, well beyond the 49.8% that fiber covers, which means the cable networks now report 100 Mbps uploads too. The 1,000/100 gigabit tier jumped from 33.9%2 to 94.4%; for Michigan as a whole it stands at 58.1%1.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Maximum advertised download speed (Mbps) of any wired or fixed wireless offer at the location, as reported by providers to the FCC; satellite excluded. Advertised, not measured.
Show the numbers
| Area | Under 25 Mbps or none | 25–99 | 100–249 | 250–499 | 500–939 | 940–1,999 | 2,000 or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warren | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.0% | 93.7% |
| Michigan | 3.2% | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.2% | 0.3% | 43.6% | 47.4% |
| United States | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 31.0% | 61.0% |
At the top end, 93.7% of locations now have a plan advertised at 2 Gbps or faster, where 20.4% did in 2022. Copper shrank over the same years: DSL fell from 63.9%2 of locations to 51.9%1. Every speed on this page is a provider's advertised maximum; none is a test result.
Wireless: Verizon's footprint doubled
Verizon now reports fixed wireless home internet at 42,165 Warren locations (85.2%), about twice as many as in June 2022, with advertised downloads of up to 1 Gbps and 100/20 Mbps at 34.0%. T-Mobile's network covers 83.9%, and its 100/20 offer 29.0%. Taken together, licensed fixed wireless fast enough for 100/20 went from 13.0%2 of Warren's locations in 2022 to 52.7%1 now.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of broadband serviceable locations where at least one provider reports the technology, at any speed; a location can have several. Satellite is reported almost everywhere and is left out.
Show the numbers
| Technology | Warren | Michigan |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber | 49.8% | 42.6% |
| Cable | 99.5% | 81.9% |
| DSL (copper) | 51.9% | 42.5% |
| Licensed fixed wireless (incl. 5G home) | 95.2% | 86.8% |
| Unlicensed fixed wireless | 0.0% | 3.9% |
A phone plan instead of a wire
Two or three wires outside almost every Warren home do not mean a wired plan inside it. The Census Bureau's American Community Survey for 2025 puts the share of Warren households paying for cable, fiber or DSL at 74.8%, give or take ±3.6 percentage points; the statewide share is 73.8%. Another 16.5% (±3.7 percentage points) went online only through a mobile data plan, against 14.9% for Michigan; by that measure Warren ranks tied for 47th highest3 among large cities, though nearby ranks overlap within the survey's error.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables. Availability is a share of locations as of June 30, 2026 (FCC); subscriptions are a share of households from the American Community Survey, 2025 (whiskers: 90% margin of error). Different units and dates: read the gap as a sign, not an exact number.
Show the numbers
| Measure | Share | MOE |
|---|---|---|
| Wired 100/20 Mbps available (FCC, share of locations) | 99.7% | |
| Households subscribing to cable, fiber or DSL (Census) | 74.8% | ±3.6 |
| Households relying only on a cellular data plan | 16.5% | ±3.7 |
| Households with no internet subscription | 5.0% | ±1.6 |
The share with no internet subscription fell from 13.9% in 2019 (±2.8 percentage points4) to 5.0% in 2025 (±1.6 percentage points3), a difference larger than either margin. Survey figures describe households over a year; the FCC figures describe locations on one date.
Warren beside its neighbors
Sterling Heights, directly north, has the same two cable networks and almost the same share of locations with two or more wired choices, but less fiber. Detroit, to the south, has one cable network at most addresses.
| Area | Fiber available | Two or more wired choices | Three or more wired choices | Two or more fiber networks | Households relying only on a cellular data plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warren, Michigan | 49.8% | 96.5% | 54.5% | 0.0% | 16.5% ±3.7 |
| Sterling Heights, Michigan | 22.0% | 95.1% | 30.2% | 1.3% | 13.8% ±2.6 |
| Detroit, Michigan | 27.4% | 35.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 20.8% ±1.4 |
| Michigan | 42.6% | 44.4% | 13.8% | 5.9% | 14.9% ±0.3 |
| United States | 62.6% | 55.6% | 11.1% | 12.1% | – |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people. ± is the 90% margin of error.
| Area | Fiber available | Gigabit (1,000/100) | Two or more wired choices | Fiber networks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Valley City, Utah | 92.9% | 99.9% | 93.2% | 9 |
| Hampton, Virginia | 70.8% | 73.2% | 67.8% | 2 |
| Torrance, California | 67.3% | 72.7% | 69.4% | 7 |
| Dayton, Ohio | 61.8% | 61.8% | 61.7% | 5 |
| Warren, Michigan | 49.8% | 94.4% | 96.5% | 2 |
| Cedar Rapids, Iowa | 35.2% | 98.5% | 77.5% | 9 |
| Orange, California | 28.7% | 32.6% | 37.1% | 6 |
| Fargo, North Dakota | 22.6% | 94.6% | 93.8% | 7 |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
A note on counts: the FCC's 49,4961 locations and the Census Bureau's 56,8393 households measure different things, since a whole apartment building is a single FCC location. Warren is in Macomb County; the Michigan page covers every county in the state, and the Detroit page the city next door.
Questions and answers
What internet providers are available in Warren, Michigan?
Three wired networks cover most of the city: Xfinity cable (99.4% of locations), WOW! cable (95.3%) and AT&T (93.5%, fiber on part of the city and DSL or fixed wireless on most of the rest). Verizon (85.2%) and T-Mobile (83.9%1) report fixed wireless home internet.
Is fiber internet available in Warren?
At 49.8% of homes and businesses as of June 30, 2026, against 42.6% across Michigan and 62.6% nationally. AT&T reports fiber at 48.4% of locations and 123NET at 1.3%1.
How many internet providers does Warren have?
4 wired providers report service somewhere in the city, 2 of them with fiber. At a typical location there are 2.51 wired providers at 100/20 Mbps on average, and 54.5%1 of locations have three or more.
Can I get 5G home internet in Warren?
Verizon reports fixed wireless home internet at 85.2% of locations and offers 100/20 Mbps at 34.0%; T-Mobile reports 83.9%, with 100/20 at 29.0%1. Carriers accept sign-ups address by address, because a tower sector's capacity is shared.
Checking one address in Warren
The figures on this page describe the whole area. Which providers report service at a single home or apartment is shown only on the FCC's own map: search the address at broadbandmap.fcc.gov. If a provider is listed there but cannot actually connect you within ten business days, or the location is missing or misplaced, the map has a button to file a challenge; providers must respond, and corrections flow into later releases. Prices and plans are not part of the FCC data: each provider must show them on its broadband facts label at the point of sale.
More on internet in Michigan
The state picture, county by county: internet in Michigan. Other large cities in the state: Detroit, Grand Rapids, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Lansing and Dearborn. Compare Warren with any other city or state in the comparison tool.
Sources
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Availability as of June 30, 2026; released November 10, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; Availability as of June 30, 2022; released May 10, 2024. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables; 2025 (calendar-year sample); released October 29, 2026. api.census.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019 1-year detailed tables; 2019. api.census.gov
Margins of error (±) are at the 90% confidence level. A difference is called significant only when it passes the Census Bureau's test at that level. How every figure is built: methodology. Found an error? Write to [email protected]; corrections are listed on the updates page.