Internet in Springfield, Massachusetts
Fiber is available at 41.1% of the 38,861 homes and businesses the FCC counts in Springfield, and wired broadband of at least 100/20 Mbps at 99.9%. 40.9% of locations have a choice of two or more wired providers at that speed; at 59.0% there is only one.1
FCC National Broadband Map, availability as of June 30, 2026 (data revised November 10, 2026), as reported by providers.
Springfield in Massachusetts
Springfield is in the middle of a fiber build. GoNetspeed, absent from the 2022 map, now reports fiber at 40.8% of the city's homes and businesses, and the citywide fiber share rose by 17.1 percentage points in the six months to June 30, 2026, the 4th highest1 gain among large US cities. Everywhere else, Xfinity's cable network is still the only wired option at 100/20 Mbps.
Xfinity citywide, GoNetspeed on a growing share
As of June 30, 2026 (FCC revision of November 10, 2026), Springfield has two citywide wired networks. Xfinity lists 99.8% of the city's 38,861 homes and businesses, over cable except for fiber at 0.4%. GoNetspeed lists fiber at 40.8%1. The three national mobile carriers list fixed wireless home internet across most of the city, Verizon lists fiber at a few dozen addresses, and Aervivo, Crossroads Fiber, TPx Communications and Spectrum list only a few each.
| Xfinity | Fiber Cable | 99.8% | 99.8% | 2 Gbps | 59.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile | Licensed wireless | 76.9% | 7.7% | 100 Mbps | – |
| Verizon | Fiber Licensed wireless | 66.9% | 33.3% | 2.3 Gbps | 0.0% |
| AT&T | Licensed wireless | 51.0% | 3.4% | 100 Mbps | – |
| GoNetspeed | Fiber | 40.8% | 40.8% | 6 Gbps | 0.0% |
| Aervivo | Fiber | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1 Gbps | – |
| CROSSROADS FIBER | Fiber | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1 Gbps | 0.0% |
| Spectrum | Cable | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1 Gbps | – |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of the area's broadband serviceable locations where the provider reports service as of June 30, 2026. "Only wired option" is the share of locations where it is the single wired provider at 100/20 Mbps. Provider-reported and challengeable; speeds are advertised maximums, not measured; no prices. Satellite providers (Viasat, Starlink, HughesNet) report service at nearly every location and are left out of the table.
In the FCC data, a provider is available at a location if it serves it now or says it could connect it within ten business days of a standard request. The counts follow Springfield's city limits as of the 2020 Census. Any listing can be looked up or disputed on the FCC National Broadband Map.
A fiber network built in four years
On June 30, 2022, the date of the first national map, fiber reached 0.0%2 of Springfield's locations. By December 31, 2025 it reached 24.0%3, and six months later 41.1%. Nearly all of it belongs to one company. GoNetspeed listed no Springfield locations in 2022; it now lists 15,835, all over fiber, with an advertised top download of 6 Gbps. That is more than half of the 28,7711 locations GoNetspeed lists in all of Massachusetts.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Fiber available |
|---|---|
| Boston | 87.3% |
| Lowell | 80.3% |
| United States | 62.6% |
| Massachusetts | 54.5% |
| Springfield | 41.1% |
| Worcester | 35.3% |
| Cambridge | 0.5% |
The chart puts the result in context. Springfield's fiber share ranks tied for 66th lowest among the 343 cities of 100,000 or more and still below the statewide 54.5%, but it has passed Worcester (35.3%). Meanwhile the old telephone copper has all but left the map: DSL covered 43.9%2 of locations in 2022 and 0.0%1 in 2026.
Two wires on GoNetspeed's streets, one elsewhere
How much choice a Springfield address has depends on whether GoNetspeed's fiber passes it. If it does, two wired providers offer 100/20 Mbps or more; if not, Xfinity is the only one. The city splits 40.9% to 59.0% between those two cases. In 2022 the single-provider case applied at 96.9%2 of locations. Statewide, 55.4%1 of locations have at least two wired choices at that speed.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Different wired providers (fiber, cable or DSL; FCC provider IDs) reporting 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up or more at the same location. Fixed wireless and satellite are not counted.
Show the numbers
| Area | None | One | Two | Three or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Springfield | 0.1% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 0.0% |
| Massachusetts | 0.9% | 43.7% | 45.3% | 10.1% |
| United States | 7.8% | 36.6% | 44.6% | 11.1% |
A third wired network at that speed is essentially absent (0.0% of locations), and two separate fiber networks overlap at only 0.2%. Gaps are tiny: 52 locations lack a wired 100/20 provider, and 131 count as unserved for BEAD, the federal grant program, meaning they lack reliable 25/3 Mbps service by wire or licensed fixed wireless.
Gigabit with fast uploads at almost every address
Springfield's speed figures run well ahead of its fiber figures. Gigabit service with uploads of 100 Mbps or more, the FCC's 1,000/100 tier, is advertised at 97.2% of locations, against 68.4% across Massachusetts and 72.3% nationally. In 2022 the tier was advertised at 0.0%2; the rise since then ranks tied for 4th highest among large cities. Symmetrical 100/100 Mbps service is advertised at 97.2%1.
Worcester, Massachusetts 0.7%Clarksville, Tennessee 100.0%
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Each dot is a city. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Gigabit (1,000/100) |
|---|---|
| Chattanooga, Tennessee | 100.0% |
| Clarksville, Tennessee | 100.0% |
| West Valley City, Utah | 99.9% |
| Sparks, Nevada | 99.9% |
| Boulder, Colorado | 99.9% |
| Lincoln, Nebraska | 99.9% |
| Simi Valley, California | 99.9% |
| Longmont, Colorado | 99.9% |
| Reno, Nevada | 99.8% |
| Pompano Beach, Florida | 99.8% |
| Eugene, Oregon | 99.8% |
| Aurora, Illinois | 99.7% |
| Arvada, Colorado | 99.7% |
| Salt Lake City, Utah | 99.7% |
| Fishers, Indiana | 99.7% |
| Hillsboro, Oregon | 99.6% |
| Gresham, Oregon | 99.6% |
| Manchester, New Hampshire | 99.6% |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | 99.6% |
| Knoxville, Tennessee | 99.5% |
| Independence, Missouri | 99.5% |
| Hollywood, Florida | 99.5% |
| Centennial, Colorado | 99.5% |
| San Mateo, California | 99.4% |
| Sandy Springs, Georgia | 99.4% |
| Des Moines, Iowa | 99.4% |
| Fairfield, California | 99.3% |
| Greeley, Colorado | 99.3% |
| Olathe, Kansas | 99.3% |
| Overland Park, Kansas | 99.3% |
| Miami Gardens, Florida | 99.3% |
| Rochester, Minnesota | 99.3% |
| Pasadena, Texas | 99.2% |
| Hialeah, Florida | 99.2% |
| Provo, Utah | 99.2% |
| Visalia, California | 99.2% |
| Miami, Florida | 99.1% |
| Colorado Springs, Colorado | 99.1% |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota | 98.9% |
| Miramar, Florida | 98.8% |
| Louisville, Kentucky | 98.7% |
| Lexington, Kentucky | 98.7% |
| Broken Arrow, Oklahoma | 98.6% |
| Huntsville, Alabama | 98.6% |
| Frisco, Texas | 98.6% |
| Allen, Texas | 98.6% |
| Cedar Rapids, Iowa | 98.5% |
| Murfreesboro, Tennessee | 98.5% |
| McKinney, Texas | 98.5% |
| Hartford, Connecticut | 98.5% |
| Peoria, Illinois | 98.5% |
| Amarillo, Texas | 98.4% |
| Sugar Land, Texas | 98.4% |
| Conroe, Texas | 98.3% |
| League City, Texas | 98.3% |
| Cincinnati, Ohio | 98.2% |
| Nashville, Tennessee | 98.2% |
| Fort Collins, Colorado | 98.1% |
| Waterbury, Connecticut | 98.0% |
| Norfolk, Virginia | 98.0% |
| Clovis, California | 98.0% |
| Fremont, California | 97.9% |
| Pembroke Pines, Florida | 97.9% |
| Pearland, Texas | 97.9% |
| Stockton, California | 97.8% |
| Mesquite, Texas | 97.7% |
| Arlington, Texas | 97.7% |
| San Angelo, Texas | 97.6% |
| Sacramento, California | 97.5% |
| Fort Lauderdale, Florida | 97.5% |
| Kansas City, Missouri | 97.4% |
| West Jordan, Utah | 97.4% |
| Baltimore, Maryland | 97.2% |
| Abilene, Texas | 97.2% |
| Springfield, Massachusetts | 97.2% |
| Rochester, New York | 97.1% |
| Fort Worth, Texas | 97.0% |
| Lakewood, Colorado | 97.0% |
| Plano, Texas | 97.0% |
| North Las Vegas, Nevada | 97.0% |
| Atlanta, Georgia | 96.9% |
| St. Louis, Missouri | 96.9% |
| Dallas, Texas | 96.9% |
| Grand Prairie, Texas | 96.9% |
| Vancouver, Washington | 96.9% |
| Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 96.9% |
| Richardson, Texas | 96.9% |
| New Haven, Connecticut | 96.9% |
| Oakland, California | 96.9% |
| Spokane, Washington | 96.8% |
| Las Vegas, Nevada | 96.8% |
| Lee's Summit, Missouri | 96.8% |
| Henderson, Nevada | 96.8% |
| Bridgeport, Connecticut | 96.7% |
| Westminster, Colorado | 96.7% |
| Jackson, Mississippi | 96.6% |
| Lynn, Massachusetts | 96.6% |
| Little Rock, Arkansas | 96.6% |
| Garland, Texas | 96.5% |
| Wichita Falls, Texas | 96.4% |
| Cape Coral, Florida | 96.4% |
| Pueblo, Colorado | 96.3% |
| Jersey City, New Jersey | 96.3% |
| Wichita, Kansas | 96.2% |
| San Jose, California | 96.2% |
| Carrollton, Texas | 96.2% |
| Grand Rapids, Michigan | 96.2% |
| Buckeye, Arizona | 96.1% |
| Denver, Colorado | 96.0% |
| Yonkers, New York | 96.0% |
| Gilbert, Arizona | 96.0% |
| Houston, Texas | 95.9% |
| Norman, Oklahoma | 95.9% |
| Irving, Texas | 95.9% |
| Lewisville, Texas | 95.9% |
| Oceanside, California | 95.8% |
| Boca Raton, Florida | 95.8% |
| Seattle, Washington | 95.7% |
| Naperville, Illinois | 95.7% |
| Davenport, Iowa | 95.6% |
| South Fulton, Georgia | 95.6% |
| Everett, Washington | 95.4% |
| Chula Vista, California | 95.4% |
| Cary, North Carolina | 95.1% |
| Lowell, Massachusetts | 95.0% |
| Thornton, Colorado | 94.9% |
| Irvine, California | 94.9% |
| Palm Coast, Florida | 94.8% |
| St. Paul, Minnesota | 94.8% |
| Surprise, Arizona | 94.6% |
| Fargo, North Dakota | 94.6% |
| Elizabeth, New Jersey | 94.5% |
| Warren, Michigan | 94.4% |
| Kansas City, Kansas | 94.2% |
| Daly City, California | 94.2% |
| Roseville, California | 94.2% |
| Vallejo, California | 94.2% |
| Paterson, New Jersey | 93.9% |
| Omaha, Nebraska | 93.8% |
| Menifee, California | 93.8% |
| Vacaville, California | 93.6% |
| Bellevue, Washington | 93.5% |
| Stamford, Connecticut | 93.5% |
| Hayward, California | 93.4% |
| Newark, New Jersey | 93.3% |
| Concord, California | 93.3% |
| Round Rock, Texas | 93.2% |
| West Palm Beach, Florida | 92.9% |
| Fayetteville, Arkansas | 92.8% |
| Peoria, Arizona | 92.7% |
| Temecula, California | 92.6% |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | 92.4% |
| Murrieta, California | 92.3% |
| Berkeley, California | 92.3% |
| Columbia, Missouri | 92.3% |
| Port St. Lucie, Florida | 92.3% |
| Santa Clara, California | 92.2% |
| Memphis, Tennessee | 92.1% |
| Lubbock, Texas | 92.1% |
| Topeka, Kansas | 91.8% |
| Fresno, California | 91.8% |
| Lansing, Michigan | 91.8% |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | 91.6% |
| Lafayette, Louisiana | 91.6% |
| Augusta, Georgia | 91.5% |
| Scottsdale, Arizona | 91.4% |
| Fort Wayne, Indiana | 91.2% |
| Glendale, Arizona | 91.2% |
| High Point, North Carolina | 91.2% |
| El Cajon, California | 91.1% |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | 91.0% |
| Rockford, Illinois | 91.0% |
| Washington, District of Columbia | 90.7% |
| Davie, Florida | 90.6% |
| Edmond, Oklahoma | 90.5% |
| Phoenix, Arizona | 90.4% |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | 90.4% |
| Jacksonville, Florida | 90.3% |
| Goodyear, Arizona | 90.3% |
| Yuma, Arizona | 90.0% |
| Elk Grove, California | 90.0% |
| Honolulu, Hawaii | 90.0% |
| Killeen, Texas | 89.9% |
| Carmel, Indiana | 89.9% |
| Elgin, Illinois | 89.8% |
| Tyler, Texas | 89.6% |
| Durham, North Carolina | 89.5% |
| Chandler, Arizona | 89.3% |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 88.9% |
| Richmond, California | 88.8% |
| Avondale, Arizona | 88.8% |
| Concord, North Carolina | 88.7% |
| Antioch, California | 88.6% |
| Mobile, Alabama | 88.4% |
| Denton, Texas | 88.2% |
| San Antonio, Texas | 88.2% |
| Tampa, Florida | 87.8% |
| Tuscaloosa, Alabama | 87.6% |
| Fayetteville, North Carolina | 87.4% |
| Gainesville, Florida | 87.2% |
| Hesperia, California | 87.1% |
| Alexandria, Virginia | 86.9% |
| New Orleans, Louisiana | 86.6% |
| Indianapolis, Indiana | 86.4% |
| New York, New York | 86.3% |
| Downey, California | 86.2% |
| Spokane Valley, Washington | 86.0% |
| Odessa, Texas | 85.9% |
| Macon, Georgia | 85.9% |
| Portland, Oregon | 85.8% |
| Tacoma, Washington | 85.7% |
| Baton Rouge, Louisiana | 85.5% |
| Tucson, Arizona | 85.4% |
| Mesa, Arizona | 85.3% |
| Aurora, Colorado | 85.3% |
| Escondido, California | 85.1% |
| Tempe, Arizona | 84.7% |
| Salinas, California | 84.7% |
| Long Beach, California | 83.9% |
| Charlotte, North Carolina | 83.7% |
| Modesto, California | 83.5% |
| Coral Springs, Florida | 83.1% |
| Fort Myers, Florida | 83.0% |
| Boston, Massachusetts | 82.8% |
| Thousand Oaks, California | 82.8% |
| Tallahassee, Florida | 82.7% |
| Joliet, Illinois | 82.7% |
| Midland, Texas | 82.6% |
| Lancaster, California | 82.5% |
| Austin, Texas | 82.4% |
| Salem, Oregon | 82.2% |
| Providence, Rhode Island | 82.1% |
| Victorville, California | 82.0% |
| Greensboro, North Carolina | 81.8% |
| Ontario, California | 81.5% |
| Pomona, California | 81.4% |
| Savannah, Georgia | 81.4% |
| West Covina, California | 80.7% |
| San Francisco, California | 79.6% |
| Santa Maria, California | 79.5% |
| South Bend, Indiana | 79.1% |
| Charleston, South Carolina | 78.7% |
| Brockton, Massachusetts | 78.6% |
| Detroit, Michigan | 78.6% |
| Corpus Christi, Texas | 78.1% |
| Cambridge, Massachusetts | 78.0% |
| Ann Arbor, Michigan | 77.9% |
| Shreveport, Louisiana | 77.8% |
| Fullerton, California | 77.7% |
| Newport News, Virginia | 77.2% |
| Sunnyvale, California | 76.8% |
| Deltona, Florida | 76.4% |
| Nampa, Idaho | 75.8% |
| New Braunfels, Texas | 75.1% |
| Green Bay, Wisconsin | 74.4% |
| North Charleston, South Carolina | 73.3% |
| Hampton, Virginia | 73.2% |
| Torrance, California | 72.7% |
| Springfield, Illinois | 72.7% |
| Anchorage, Alaska | 72.3% |
| Dearborn, Michigan | 72.2% |
| Huntington Beach, California | 72.1% |
| Meridian, Idaho | 72.0% |
| Virginia Beach, Virginia | 71.8% |
| New Bedford, Massachusetts | 71.6% |
| Madison, Wisconsin | 71.6% |
| Columbia, South Carolina | 70.4% |
| Moreno Valley, California | 70.0% |
| St. Petersburg, Florida | 69.9% |
| Suffolk, Virginia | 69.7% |
| Orlando, Florida | 69.5% |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 69.5% |
| Waco, Texas | 69.2% |
| Brownsville, Texas | 69.2% |
| San Bernardino, California | 69.1% |
| Wilmington, North Carolina | 68.9% |
| Santa Rosa, California | 68.7% |
| Chicago, Illinois | 68.4% |
| Kent, Washington | 68.0% |
| Sterling Heights, Michigan | 67.9% |
| Chesapeake, Virginia | 67.5% |
| Garden Grove, California | 67.4% |
| Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 67.2% |
| Beaumont, Texas | 65.6% |
| Renton, Washington | 65.3% |
| Laredo, Texas | 65.2% |
| Evansville, Indiana | 63.6% |
| St. George, Utah | 63.4% |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | 63.4% |
| Tracy, California | 63.3% |
| San Diego, California | 63.1% |
| Lakeland, Florida | 62.9% |
| Palm Bay, Florida | 62.6% |
| El Paso, Texas | 62.0% |
| Dayton, Ohio | 61.8% |
| Columbus, Georgia | 61.3% |
| Montgomery, Alabama | 60.7% |
| Allentown, Pennsylvania | 60.5% |
| Oxnard, California | 60.2% |
| Edinburg, Texas | 58.6% |
| Quincy, Massachusetts | 57.8% |
| Athens, Georgia | 57.4% |
| Clearwater, Florida | 57.0% |
| Cleveland, Ohio | 56.2% |
| Akron, Ohio | 55.1% |
| College Station, Texas | 55.1% |
| Santa Ana, California | 54.8% |
| Chico, California | 54.6% |
| Birmingham, Alabama | 53.5% |
| Los Angeles, California | 53.3% |
| Inglewood, California | 52.9% |
| Toledo, Ohio | 52.8% |
| Burbank, California | 52.5% |
| Costa Mesa, California | 49.4% |
| Columbus, Ohio | 46.1% |
| Pasadena, California | 45.6% |
| Springfield, Missouri | 45.5% |
| Billings, Montana | 44.3% |
| McAllen, Texas | 43.7% |
| Las Cruces, New Mexico | 42.9% |
| Glendale, California | 40.2% |
| Buffalo, New York | 40.1% |
| Bakersfield, California | 40.1% |
| Riverside, California | 38.3% |
| Anaheim, California | 37.9% |
| Georgetown, Texas | 37.4% |
| Boise, Idaho | 37.2% |
| Palmdale, California | 36.9% |
| Carlsbad, California | 36.0% |
| Bend, Oregon | 35.1% |
| El Monte, California | 34.1% |
| Richmond, Virginia | 32.9% |
| Orange, California | 32.6% |
| Fontana, California | 30.5% |
| Jurupa Valley, California | 27.8% |
| Ventura, California | 23.8% |
| Rancho Cucamonga, California | 21.8% |
| Rialto, California | 20.7% |
| Santa Clarita, California | 18.4% |
| Corona, California | 13.6% |
| Albany, New York | 1.6% |
| Syracuse, New York | 1.3% |
| Worcester, Massachusetts | 0.7% |
The top advertised download moved up too. In 2022, 99.7%2 of locations topped out at about 1 Gbps; in 2026, 97.1% have a top tier of 2 Gbps or more. Fiber reaches only 41.1%, and no fixed wireless provider in the city advertises above 1 Gbps, so most of those locations reach the 2 Gbps tier over Xfinity's cable network. Worcester, where Spectrum is the cable company, shows the opposite pattern: 1,000/100 service there is advertised at 0.7%1 of locations.
These are the fastest speeds providers advertise, not tests of what a home receives.
Fixed wireless: wide footprints, slower tiers
All three carriers list home internet over their cellular networks across large parts of Springfield: T-Mobile at 76.9% of locations, Verizon at 66.9% and AT&T at 51.0%, up from none for AT&T in 2022. Their speed ceilings sit well below cable and fiber. T-Mobile and AT&T top out at 100 Mbps, and 100/20 Mbps is offered at 7.7% of locations by T-Mobile, 3.4% by AT&T and 33.3%1 by Verizon.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of broadband serviceable locations where at least one provider reports the technology, at any speed; a location can have several. Satellite is reported almost everywhere and is left out.
Show the numbers
| Technology | Springfield | Massachusetts |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber | 41.1% | 54.5% |
| Cable | 99.4% | 97.4% |
| DSL (copper) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Licensed fixed wireless (incl. 5G home) | 91.5% | 84.2% |
| Unlicensed fixed wireless | 0.0% | 3.8% |
So adding the carriers changes the choice count less than the footprints suggest: three or more providers of any terrestrial kind at 100/20 Mbps are reported at 18.8% of locations, the 19th lowest1 share among large cities. A tower sector's capacity is shared, so a listing in the FCC data does not guarantee that a given home can sign up. The 5G home internet page explains the service.
About one household in five on a cellular plan alone
What Springfield households buy differs from what is on offer. In the Census Bureau's 2025 survey, 20.1% of households used only a cellular data plan for internet at home (margin of error ±4.0 percentage points), against 12.2% across Massachusetts; among large cities, Springfield ranks tied for 14th highest on this measure. Subscriptions to cable, fiber or DSL covered 70.4% (±3.5 percentage points), compared with 81.4%4 statewide.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables. Availability is a share of locations as of June 30, 2026 (FCC); subscriptions are a share of households from the American Community Survey, 2025 (whiskers: 90% margin of error). Different units and dates: read the gap as a sign, not an exact number.
Show the numbers
| Measure | Share | MOE |
|---|---|---|
| Wired 100/20 Mbps available (FCC, share of locations) | 99.9% | |
| Households subscribing to cable, fiber or DSL (Census) | 70.4% | ±3.5 |
| Households relying only on a cellular data plan | 20.1% | ±4.0 |
| Households with no internet subscription | 7.1% | ±2.2 |
Fewer households now go without any subscription: 7.1% (±2.2 percentage points) in the latest survey, against 24.0% (±4.0 percentage points5) in 2019, a difference far larger than the margins. The survey's 60,1414 households outnumber the FCC's locations because the FCC counts a whole apartment building once. Households across a year and locations on one date are not the same unit, so compare the two only roughly.
Springfield beside cities its size
The table lines Springfield up with the large cities nearest to it in population, all from the same FCC release.
| Area | Fiber available | Gigabit (1,000/100) | Two or more wired choices | Fiber networks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgeport, Connecticut | 96.8% | 96.7% | 89.7% | 4 |
| Hollywood, Florida | 77.0% | 99.5% | 77.8% | 6 |
| Lakewood, Colorado | 72.1% | 97.0% | 73.5% | 4 |
| Hayward, California | 65.1% | 93.4% | 67.4% | 4 |
| Sunnyvale, California | 49.7% | 76.8% | 55.2% | 4 |
| Springfield, Massachusetts | 41.1% | 97.2% | 40.9% | 5 |
| Bellevue, Washington | 27.4% | 93.5% | 35.7% | 4 |
| Naperville, Illinois | 18.0% | 95.7% | 95.5% | 6 |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Hampden County, which contains Springfield, appears with every other county on the Massachusetts page; Boston and Worcester have their own pages.
Questions about internet service in Springfield
What internet providers are available in Springfield, MA?
Two wired networks cover the city: Xfinity, mostly cable, at 99.8% of locations, and GoNetspeed, all fiber, at 40.8%. T-Mobile (76.9%), Verizon (66.9%) and AT&T (51.0%1) list fixed wireless home internet. Small fiber and DSL companies list a handful of addresses, and the satellite services list every one. FCC data as of June 30, 2026; to check one home, use the FCC map.
Is fiber internet available in Springfield?
At 41.1% of locations as of June 30, 2026, nearly all of it GoNetspeed's. That is up from 0.0%2 in June 2022 and 24.0%3 in December 2025. Massachusetts as a whole is at 54.5% and the US at 62.6%1.
How many internet providers are there in Springfield?
Counting only wired service, 6 companies appear in the FCC data for the city, and 8 once fixed wireless is added; only Xfinity and GoNetspeed list wired service at more than a few dozen addresses. For a given home the answer is one or two: one wired provider offers 100/20 Mbps at 59.0% of locations, two at 40.9%1.
Is 5G home internet available in Springfield?
T-Mobile lists fixed wireless home internet at 76.9% of locations, Verizon at nearly all of the 66.9% of locations it lists and AT&T at 51.0%. Far fewer get 100/20 Mbps from them: 7.7% from T-Mobile, 33.3% from Verizon and 3.4%1 from AT&T. Whether a particular home can sign up is the carrier's decision.
Checking one address in Springfield
The figures on this page describe the whole area. Which providers report service at a single home or apartment is shown only on the FCC's own map: search the address at broadbandmap.fcc.gov. If a provider is listed there but cannot actually connect you within ten business days, or the location is missing or misplaced, the map has a button to file a challenge; providers must respond, and corrections flow into later releases. Prices and plans are not part of the FCC data: each provider must show them on its broadband facts label at the point of sale.
More on internet in Massachusetts
The state picture, county by county: internet in Massachusetts. Other large cities in the state: Boston, Worcester, Cambridge, Lowell, Brockton, Lynn, Quincy and New Bedford. Compare Springfield with any other city or state in the comparison tool.
Sources
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Availability as of June 30, 2026; released November 10, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; Availability as of June 30, 2022; released May 10, 2024. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of December 31, 2025; Availability as of December 31, 2025; released November 3, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables; 2025 (calendar-year sample); released October 29, 2026. api.census.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019 1-year detailed tables; 2019. api.census.gov
Margins of error (±) are at the 90% confidence level. A difference is called significant only when it passes the Census Bureau's test at that level. How every figure is built: methodology. Found an error? Write to [email protected]; corrections are listed on the updates page.