Internet in Beaumont, Texas
Fiber is available at 65.6% of the 41,701 homes and businesses the FCC counts in Beaumont, and wired broadband of at least 100/20 Mbps at 94.8%. 63.4% of locations have a choice of two or more wired providers at that speed; at 31.3% there is only one.1
FCC National Broadband Map, availability as of June 30, 2026 (data revised November 10, 2026), as reported by providers.
Beaumont in Texas
Home internet in Beaumont runs on two wires. Spectrum's cable network reaches 93.2% of the city's homes and businesses and AT&T's fiber 65.0%; across most of the city that AT&T fiber does not reach, Spectrum is the only fast wired option. A third wired provider at 100/20 Mbps is reported at 0.0%1 of locations, tied for the lowest share among the country's larger cities.
Spectrum everywhere, AT&T fiber at two locations in three
The FCC counts 41,701 homes and businesses inside Beaumont's city limits, and as of June 30, 2026 (file revision of November 10, 2026) the list of who serves them is short. Spectrum reports service at 93.2% of locations, almost all of it over cable; it reports fiber at 0.6%. AT&T reports service at 89.5%, a mix of three technologies: fiber at 65.0%1 of the city's locations, and copper DSL or fixed wireless across much of the rest.
| Spectrum | Fiber Cable | 93.2% | 93.2% | 1 Gbps | 29.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T | Fiber DSL Licensed wireless | 89.5% | 67.3% | 5 Gbps | 1.6% |
| Verizon | Licensed wireless | 80.4% | 55.0% | 300 Mbps | – |
| T-Mobile | Licensed wireless | 75.9% | 20.1% | 100 Mbps | – |
| Rural Telecommunications of America | Fixed wireless | 1.3% | 1.3% | 300 Mbps | – |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Share of the area's broadband serviceable locations where the provider reports service as of June 30, 2026. "Only wired option" is the share of locations where it is the single wired provider at 100/20 Mbps. Provider-reported and challengeable; speeds are advertised maximums, not measured; no prices. Satellite providers (HughesNet, Starlink, Viasat) report service at nearly every location and are left out of the table.
Below those two, the wired list is almost empty: Spectrum and AT&T are the only wired providers that report home service in the city. Rural Telecommunications of America reports a local fixed wireless network at 1.3%1. A provider counts as available here when it tells the FCC it could connect a location within ten business days; the claim can be challenged on the FCC National Broadband Map.
No third wire
Fast wired service itself is close to universal: 94.8% of locations have at least one wired provider offering 100/20 Mbps. What Beaumont lacks is a third. The share of locations with three or more wired providers at that speed is 0.0%, tied for the lowest among the 343 US cities of 100,000 or more, against 17.4% for Texas and 11.1% nationally. Two such providers are reported at 63.4% of locations and exactly one at 31.3%1.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Different wired providers (fiber, cable or DSL; FCC provider IDs) reporting 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up or more at the same location. Fixed wireless and satellite are not counted.
Show the numbers
| Area | None | One | Two | Three or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaumont | 5.2% | 31.3% | 63.4% | 0.0% |
| Texas | 9.6% | 24.2% | 48.8% | 17.4% |
| United States | 7.8% | 36.6% | 44.6% | 11.1% |
El Paso, Texas 0.0%Overland Park, Kansas 90.5%
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Each dot is a city. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Three or more wired choices |
|---|---|
| Overland Park, Kansas | 90.5% |
| Simi Valley, California | 89.1% |
| Allentown, Pennsylvania | 86.7% |
| West Valley City, Utah | 86.6% |
| Olathe, Kansas | 84.0% |
| Huntsville, Alabama | 83.2% |
| San Mateo, California | 81.7% |
| Cary, North Carolina | 81.2% |
| Amarillo, Texas | 81.0% |
| Knoxville, Tennessee | 78.5% |
| Conroe, Texas | 78.2% |
| Clarksville, Tennessee | 74.7% |
| Des Moines, Iowa | 74.2% |
| Kansas City, Missouri | 70.2% |
| Bridgeport, Connecticut | 68.6% |
| San Angelo, Texas | 68.6% |
| St. Petersburg, Florida | 68.5% |
| Salt Lake City, Utah | 68.3% |
| Odessa, Texas | 66.9% |
| Corpus Christi, Texas | 66.8% |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | 66.2% |
| Durham, North Carolina | 65.6% |
| Washington, District of Columbia | 64.5% |
| Waco, Texas | 62.9% |
| Oakland, California | 62.2% |
| Columbia, Missouri | 61.1% |
| Independence, Missouri | 60.7% |
| Midland, Texas | 59.7% |
| Columbus, Georgia | 59.3% |
| Montgomery, Alabama | 57.7% |
| Lubbock, Texas | 57.2% |
| Wichita Falls, Texas | 56.2% |
| Daly City, California | 55.6% |
| Clearwater, Florida | 54.9% |
| Warren, Michigan | 54.5% |
| Sugar Land, Texas | 54.3% |
| Dearborn, Michigan | 53.1% |
| Tacoma, Washington | 52.7% |
| Springfield, Missouri | 50.5% |
| Boston, Massachusetts | 50.4% |
| Lincoln, Nebraska | 49.4% |
| Richmond, California | 48.9% |
| Palm Coast, Florida | 48.0% |
| Killeen, Texas | 47.6% |
| Colorado Springs, Colorado | 46.7% |
| Round Rock, Texas | 46.4% |
| New Haven, Connecticut | 46.2% |
| Kansas City, Kansas | 46.0% |
| Lansing, Michigan | 45.2% |
| Fayetteville, North Carolina | 44.7% |
| Columbus, Ohio | 43.1% |
| Centennial, Colorado | 43.0% |
| Concord, California | 42.9% |
| Tyler, Texas | 42.0% |
| San Francisco, California | 41.8% |
| Berkeley, California | 41.6% |
| Waterbury, Connecticut | 41.0% |
| Westminster, Colorado | 39.6% |
| Concord, North Carolina | 39.1% |
| Coral Springs, Florida | 38.1% |
| Austin, Texas | 37.5% |
| Abilene, Texas | 36.9% |
| Lakewood, Colorado | 34.9% |
| Lexington, Kentucky | 34.5% |
| Pearland, Texas | 34.4% |
| Lancaster, California | 33.9% |
| Gainesville, Florida | 33.8% |
| Wichita, Kansas | 33.7% |
| Grand Rapids, Michigan | 33.7% |
| Nashville, Tennessee | 33.6% |
| Elgin, Illinois | 33.3% |
| Elk Grove, California | 33.1% |
| Lee's Summit, Missouri | 33.1% |
| Omaha, Nebraska | 33.0% |
| Fayetteville, Arkansas | 32.1% |
| Broken Arrow, Oklahoma | 31.7% |
| Pueblo, Colorado | 31.4% |
| Fishers, Indiana | 31.4% |
| Green Bay, Wisconsin | 30.8% |
| Spokane, Washington | 30.6% |
| Sterling Heights, Michigan | 30.2% |
| Fort Collins, Colorado | 30.1% |
| San Antonio, Texas | 29.8% |
| Fullerton, California | 27.9% |
| Lafayette, Louisiana | 27.9% |
| Hillsboro, Oregon | 27.9% |
| Greensboro, North Carolina | 27.5% |
| Carmel, Indiana | 26.8% |
| Chula Vista, California | 26.6% |
| Norman, Oklahoma | 25.2% |
| Davenport, Iowa | 24.3% |
| Charleston, South Carolina | 24.0% |
| North Charleston, South Carolina | 23.5% |
| Hayward, California | 22.9% |
| West Jordan, Utah | 22.5% |
| Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 22.3% |
| Alexandria, Virginia | 22.0% |
| Naperville, Illinois | 21.5% |
| Chicago, Illinois | 21.4% |
| Allen, Texas | 21.3% |
| Palm Bay, Florida | 20.7% |
| Irvine, California | 20.5% |
| Eugene, Oregon | 20.0% |
| Dayton, Ohio | 19.9% |
| Augusta, Georgia | 19.9% |
| Nampa, Idaho | 19.4% |
| Sacramento, California | 19.1% |
| Murfreesboro, Tennessee | 18.5% |
| Mesa, Arizona | 18.4% |
| Topeka, Kansas | 18.0% |
| Columbia, South Carolina | 17.8% |
| Thornton, Colorado | 17.7% |
| Port St. Lucie, Florida | 17.4% |
| Longmont, Colorado | 17.3% |
| McKinney, Texas | 17.2% |
| South Fulton, Georgia | 16.9% |
| Fargo, North Dakota | 16.7% |
| Atlanta, Georgia | 16.0% |
| Frisco, Texas | 15.7% |
| Tuscaloosa, Alabama | 15.6% |
| Charlotte, North Carolina | 15.1% |
| Savannah, Georgia | 14.5% |
| Deltona, Florida | 13.6% |
| Indianapolis, Indiana | 13.5% |
| Memphis, Tennessee | 13.4% |
| Lakeland, Florida | 13.0% |
| Surprise, Arizona | 12.9% |
| Santa Rosa, California | 12.3% |
| Plano, Texas | 11.9% |
| Rockford, Illinois | 11.9% |
| Meridian, Idaho | 11.8% |
| Edinburg, Texas | 11.7% |
| Baton Rouge, Louisiana | 11.6% |
| Springfield, Illinois | 11.1% |
| Menifee, California | 10.9% |
| Jacksonville, Florida | 10.7% |
| Laredo, Texas | 10.4% |
| Ontario, California | 10.3% |
| Rochester, New York | 10.3% |
| Vallejo, California | 10.3% |
| Louisville, Kentucky | 9.9% |
| Chesapeake, Virginia | 9.9% |
| Palmdale, California | 9.9% |
| Buckeye, Arizona | 9.6% |
| Billings, Montana | 9.4% |
| Seattle, Washington | 9.3% |
| Salem, Oregon | 9.2% |
| Chattanooga, Tennessee | 9.1% |
| Arvada, Colorado | 8.6% |
| Houston, Texas | 8.5% |
| San Jose, California | 7.6% |
| Buffalo, New York | 7.2% |
| Cedar Rapids, Iowa | 7.2% |
| Greeley, Colorado | 7.2% |
| Arlington, Texas | 7.0% |
| Jackson, Mississippi | 6.9% |
| New Braunfels, Texas | 6.6% |
| St. George, Utah | 6.4% |
| Hartford, Connecticut | 6.2% |
| Pembroke Pines, Florida | 5.8% |
| New York, New York | 5.8% |
| Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 5.8% |
| Fort Worth, Texas | 5.6% |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | 5.5% |
| Wilmington, North Carolina | 5.5% |
| Goodyear, Arizona | 5.5% |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | 5.4% |
| McAllen, Texas | 5.4% |
| Brownsville, Texas | 5.2% |
| El Cajon, California | 4.9% |
| Chandler, Arizona | 4.8% |
| Newark, New Jersey | 4.7% |
| Chico, California | 4.7% |
| Virginia Beach, Virginia | 4.6% |
| Torrance, California | 4.6% |
| Tallahassee, Florida | 4.5% |
| South Bend, Indiana | 4.4% |
| Yuma, Arizona | 4.3% |
| Glendale, Arizona | 4.2% |
| High Point, North Carolina | 4.1% |
| Georgetown, Texas | 4.1% |
| Orlando, Florida | 4.1% |
| Peoria, Illinois | 4.0% |
| Rochester, Minnesota | 4.0% |
| Santa Maria, California | 4.0% |
| Vancouver, Washington | 3.7% |
| Mesquite, Texas | 3.5% |
| Suffolk, Virginia | 3.5% |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 3.3% |
| Boca Raton, Florida | 3.2% |
| Aurora, Colorado | 3.0% |
| Spokane Valley, Washington | 2.9% |
| Akron, Ohio | 2.8% |
| Norfolk, Virginia | 2.6% |
| Kent, Washington | 2.6% |
| Pompano Beach, Florida | 2.6% |
| Elizabeth, New Jersey | 2.5% |
| Bend, Oregon | 2.4% |
| Oceanside, California | 2.4% |
| Peoria, Arizona | 2.3% |
| Cleveland, Ohio | 2.2% |
| Carlsbad, California | 2.1% |
| Macon, Georgia | 2.1% |
| Fort Myers, Florida | 2.0% |
| Boise, Idaho | 1.7% |
| Aurora, Illinois | 1.7% |
| Gilbert, Arizona | 1.5% |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | 1.5% |
| El Monte, California | 1.5% |
| Mobile, Alabama | 1.4% |
| Cape Coral, Florida | 1.4% |
| Denton, Texas | 1.4% |
| Hollywood, Florida | 1.3% |
| Davie, Florida | 1.3% |
| Miami, Florida | 1.2% |
| Toledo, Ohio | 1.2% |
| Joliet, Illinois | 1.1% |
| Dallas, Texas | 1.1% |
| Rialto, California | 1.1% |
| Edmond, Oklahoma | 1.1% |
| Carrollton, Texas | 1.0% |
| Baltimore, Maryland | 0.9% |
| San Diego, California | 0.9% |
| Provo, Utah | 0.9% |
| Santa Clarita, California | 0.9% |
| Las Vegas, Nevada | 0.8% |
| Sunnyvale, California | 0.8% |
| Athens, Georgia | 0.7% |
| Las Cruces, New Mexico | 0.6% |
| Scottsdale, Arizona | 0.6% |
| Roseville, California | 0.6% |
| Everett, Washington | 0.6% |
| Rancho Cucamonga, California | 0.5% |
| Avondale, Arizona | 0.5% |
| Santa Clara, California | 0.5% |
| Sandy Springs, Georgia | 0.5% |
| Lewisville, Texas | 0.5% |
| Tucson, Arizona | 0.4% |
| Orange, California | 0.4% |
| Fremont, California | 0.4% |
| Bellevue, Washington | 0.4% |
| Richardson, Texas | 0.4% |
| Costa Mesa, California | 0.4% |
| Portland, Oregon | 0.3% |
| Madison, Wisconsin | 0.3% |
| Evansville, Indiana | 0.3% |
| West Palm Beach, Florida | 0.3% |
| Jersey City, New Jersey | 0.3% |
| Miramar, Florida | 0.3% |
| Jurupa Valley, California | 0.3% |
| Lynn, Massachusetts | 0.3% |
| Irving, Texas | 0.2% |
| Gresham, Oregon | 0.2% |
| St. Paul, Minnesota | 0.2% |
| Garland, Texas | 0.2% |
| Los Angeles, California | 0.2% |
| Ann Arbor, Michigan | 0.1% |
| Fort Lauderdale, Florida | 0.1% |
| Hialeah, Florida | 0.1% |
| Pomona, California | 0.1% |
| Miami Gardens, Florida | 0.1% |
| North Las Vegas, Nevada | 0.1% |
| Ventura, California | 0.1% |
| Denver, Colorado | 0.1% |
| Oxnard, California | 0.1% |
| Glendale, California | 0.1% |
| Downey, California | 0.1% |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota | 0.1% |
| Paterson, New Jersey | 0.1% |
| Long Beach, California | 0.1% |
| Pasadena, Texas | 0.1% |
| College Station, Texas | 0.1% |
| Quincy, Massachusetts | 0.1% |
| Detroit, Michigan | 0.0% |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | 0.0% |
| Fort Wayne, Indiana | 0.0% |
| Grand Prairie, Texas | 0.0% |
| Little Rock, Arkansas | 0.0% |
| Salinas, California | 0.0% |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | 0.0% |
| Modesto, California | 0.0% |
| Yonkers, New York | 0.0% |
| Birmingham, Alabama | 0.0% |
| Burbank, California | 0.0% |
| Henderson, Nevada | 0.0% |
| Santa Ana, California | 0.0% |
| Moreno Valley, California | 0.0% |
| Victorville, California | 0.0% |
| Cambridge, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
| Phoenix, Arizona | 0.0% |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 0.0% |
| Fresno, California | 0.0% |
| Tampa, Florida | 0.0% |
| Anaheim, California | 0.0% |
| Riverside, California | 0.0% |
| Cincinnati, Ohio | 0.0% |
| Reno, Nevada | 0.0% |
| San Bernardino, California | 0.0% |
| Fontana, California | 0.0% |
| Springfield, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
| Visalia, California | 0.0% |
| Thousand Oaks, California | 0.0% |
| Sparks, Nevada | 0.0% |
| Boulder, Colorado | 0.0% |
| Hesperia, California | 0.0% |
| Inglewood, California | 0.0% |
| El Paso, Texas | 0.0% |
| Bakersfield, California | 0.0% |
| New Orleans, Louisiana | 0.0% |
| Honolulu, Hawaii | 0.0% |
| Stockton, California | 0.0% |
| Anchorage, Alaska | 0.0% |
| St. Louis, Missouri | 0.0% |
| Richmond, Virginia | 0.0% |
| Worcester, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
| Providence, Rhode Island | 0.0% |
| Huntington Beach, California | 0.0% |
| Tempe, Arizona | 0.0% |
| Newport News, Virginia | 0.0% |
| Shreveport, Louisiana | 0.0% |
| Garden Grove, California | 0.0% |
| Corona, California | 0.0% |
| Escondido, California | 0.0% |
| Syracuse, New York | 0.0% |
| Stamford, Connecticut | 0.0% |
| Hampton, Virginia | 0.0% |
| Pasadena, California | 0.0% |
| Clovis, California | 0.0% |
| Fairfield, California | 0.0% |
| Lowell, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
| League City, Texas | 0.0% |
| Antioch, California | 0.0% |
| Manchester, New Hampshire | 0.0% |
| Temecula, California | 0.0% |
| Murrieta, California | 0.0% |
| Beaumont, Texas | 0.0% |
| Brockton, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
| West Covina, California | 0.0% |
| Renton, Washington | 0.0% |
| Vacaville, California | 0.0% |
| Tracy, California | 0.0% |
| New Bedford, Massachusetts | 0.0% |
| Albany, New York | 0.0% |
The single-wire share is almost entirely Spectrum: it is the only wired option at 100/20 Mbps for 29.8% of locations, while AT&T is the only one for 1.6%. On average a Beaumont location has 1.581 wired providers at that speed.
One fiber network, not two
2 providers report fiber somewhere in Beaumont, up from 22 in June 2022, yet the fiber map is essentially AT&T's. At least one fiber provider is reported at 65.6% of locations, and two or more at 0.0%, tied for the lowest among large cities. Across Texas, 18.2%1 of locations have two fiber networks.
Fiber is also what separates the two halves of the city on speed. Gigabit service with uploads of at least 100 Mbps, the FCC's 1,000/100 tier, is advertised at 65.6% of locations, the same share as fiber, while a 1 Gbps download alone, which Spectrum's cable network also advertises, is reported at 94.8%. Where AT&T has fiber, its fastest advertised plan is 5 Gbps; Spectrum's is 1 Gbps1. These are advertised maximums, not measured speeds.
Beaumont beside other Gulf Coast cities
Among the larger Texas cities near the Gulf shown below, Beaumont has the least fiber: 65.6% of locations, against 81.9% in Houston and 78.1% in Corpus Christi. Pasadena and League City share its lack of a third wire, with three or more wired providers at 100/20 Mbps at 0.1% and 0.0% of locations, but fiber reaches 84.6% and 89.4% of them. Corpus Christi has a third wire at 66.8%1.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Show the numbers
| Area | Fiber available |
|---|---|
| League City | 89.4% |
| Pasadena | 84.6% |
| Houston | 81.9% |
| Corpus Christi | 78.1% |
| Texas | 74.4% |
| Beaumont | 65.6% |
| United States | 62.6% |
Slow growth since 2022
Fiber reached 60.3% of Beaumont's locations on the first National Broadband Map, as of June 30, 2022, and reaches 65.6% now, a rise of 5.3 percentage points. Among the 343 large cities, that increase ranks tied for 70th lowest. Over the same years the share with two or more wired providers at 100/20 Mbps went from 59.0% to 63.4%, and the share reached by DSL over copper telephone lines fell from 25.9%2 to 20.9%1. The comparison uses shares, not counts, because the FCC revises its list of locations with each release.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of December 31, 2025; FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Shares of broadband serviceable locations in each FCC release (latest revision of each); the small number is the change in percentage points since June 30, 2022. The FCC's count of locations is updated with each release, so shares are compared rather than counts.
Show the numbers
| Measure | June 30, 2022 | December 31, 2025 | June 30, 2026 | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber available | 60.3% | 63.0% | 65.6% | 5.3 pts |
| Two or more wired choices | 59.0% | 61.3% | 63.4% | 4.4 pts |
| DSL available | 25.9% | 21.0% | 20.9% | −5.0 pts |
| Fixed wireless 100/20 | 14.5% | 42.1% | 62.2% | 47.8 pts |
The largest change came from wireless. Fixed wireless at 100/20 Mbps or faster was reported at 14.5%2 of locations in 2022 and at 62.2%1 in 2026, with 42.1%3 in between at the end of 2025.
Verizon and T-Mobile as the alternative to Spectrum
For the third of the city where Spectrum is the only wired provider at 100/20 Mbps, the other widely reported option is fixed wireless home internet over 5G or LTE. Verizon reports fixed wireless at 80.4% of Beaumont's locations, with 100/20 Mbps at 55.0% and advertised downloads up to 300 Mbps. T-Mobile reports 75.9%, with 100/20 at 20.1% and a top advertised download of 100 Mbps1. A tower sector's capacity is shared, so carriers can limit sign-ups by address; the FCC figures show where they report service, not where every home could join.
The gaps without any of this are small. Wired or fixed wireless service at 100/20 Mbps is missing at 4.3% of locations (1,775 homes and businesses), and 121 locations have only satellite.
| Measure | Beaumont | Texas | United States | Rank among largest cities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed wireless 100/20 | 62.2% | 62.3% | 47.9% | 104th of 343 |
| Fixed wireless only at 100/20 | 1.0% | 6.6% | 3.6% | tied 84th of 343 |
| No terrestrial 100/20 | 4.3% | 3.0% | 4.2% | 5th of 343 |
| Unserved | 0.1% | 2.1% | 2.4% | tied 98th of 343 |
| Satellite only | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.8% | tied 78th of 343 |
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026. Rank 1 is the highest value. FCC file revision of November 10, 2026. Shares are of broadband serviceable locations (homes and businesses), not people.
Fewer phone-only households than in 2019
The Census Bureau's American Community Survey shows how Beaumont households connect, as opposed to what is available. In 2019, 28.5% of households relied only on a cellular data plan (margin of error ±3.9 percentage points) and 54.9% subscribed to cable, fiber or DSL (margin ±4.7 percentage points). In the 2025 survey the cellular-only share was 12.5% (margin ±3.6 percentage points) and the wired share 78.3% (margin ±3.7 percentage points); in both cases the ranges do not overlap. Households with no internet subscription went from 14.4%4 to 6.6%5. The survey counts households over a year; the FCC counts locations on one date.
Source: FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables. Availability is a share of locations as of June 30, 2026 (FCC); subscriptions are a share of households from the American Community Survey, 2025 (whiskers: 90% margin of error). Different units and dates: read the gap as a sign, not an exact number.
Show the numbers
| Measure | Share | MOE |
|---|---|---|
| Wired 100/20 Mbps available (FCC, share of locations) | 94.8% | |
| Households subscribing to cable, fiber or DSL (Census) | 78.3% | ±3.7 |
| Households relying only on a cellular data plan | 12.5% | ±3.6 |
| Households with no internet subscription | 6.6% | ±2.7 |
Beaumont is in Jefferson County. The Texas page maps every county, with the wired choices in the areas around the city.
Questions about internet service in Beaumont
What internet providers are available in Beaumont, Texas?
Two companies report wired service across most of the city: Spectrum (93.2% of locations, cable with a little fiber) and AT&T (89.5%, fiber, DSL and fixed wireless). Verizon (80.4%) and T-Mobile (75.9%1) report 5G or LTE home internet, and HughesNet, Viasat and Starlink report satellite everywhere.
Is AT&T Fiber available in Beaumont?
AT&T reports fiber at 65.0% of Beaumont's locations as of June 30, 2026, with advertised downloads up to 5 Gbps. It is nearly all of the city's fiber: any provider's fiber reaches 65.6%, against 74.4%1 across Texas.
How many internet providers are there in Beaumont?
5 providers report wired or fixed wireless service somewhere in the city, 2 of them over wires: Spectrum and AT&T. At a typical address the count of wired providers offering 100/20 Mbps is one or two: 63.4% of locations have exactly two and 31.3%1 have one.
Checking one address in Beaumont
The figures on this page describe the whole area. Which providers report service at a single home or apartment is shown only on the FCC's own map: search the address at broadbandmap.fcc.gov. If a provider is listed there but cannot actually connect you within ten business days, or the location is missing or misplaced, the map has a button to file a challenge; providers must respond, and corrections flow into later releases. Prices and plans are not part of the FCC data: each provider must show them on its broadband facts label at the point of sale.
More on internet in Texas
The state picture, county by county: internet in Texas. Other large cities in the state: Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, El Paso, Arlington, Corpus Christi, Plano, Lubbock, Laredo and Irving. Compare Beaumont with any other city or state in the comparison tool.
Sources
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2026; Availability as of June 30, 2026; released November 10, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of June 30, 2022; Availability as of June 30, 2022; released May 10, 2024. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- FCC, National Broadband Map, data as of December 31, 2025; Availability as of December 31, 2025; released November 3, 2026. broadbandmap.fcc.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019 1-year detailed tables; 2019. api.census.gov
- Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2025 1-year detailed tables; 2025 (calendar-year sample); released October 29, 2026. api.census.gov
Margins of error (±) are at the 90% confidence level. A difference is called significant only when it passes the Census Bureau's test at that level. How every figure is built: methodology. Found an error? Write to [email protected]; corrections are listed on the updates page.